1999
DOI: 10.1124/mol.56.2.419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agonist-Induced Phosphorylation by G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases of the EP4 Receptor Carboxyl-Terminal Domain in an EP3/EP4 Prostaglandin E2Receptor Hybrid

Abstract: Prostaglandin E 2 receptors (EP-Rs) belong to the family of heterotrimeric G protein-coupled ectoreceptors with seven transmembrane domains. They can be subdivided into four subtypes according to their ligand-binding and G protein-coupling specificity: EP1 couple to G q , EP2 and EP4 to G s , and EP3 to G i . The EP4-R, in contrast to the EP3␤-R, shows rapid agonist-induced desensitization. The agonist-induced desensitization depends on the presence of the EP4-R carboxyl-terminal domain, which also confers des… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the difference in the amount of EP4 receptor co-precipitating with ARR2-GFP versus ARR2(R169E)-GFP was minimal. Whereas a greater amount of the EP4 receptor migrating at ϳ55 kDa was observed to coprecipitate with ARR2(R169E)-GFP, aggregates of the receptor (migrating at ϳ100 -150-kDa oligomers (49)) that co-precipitated with ARR2-GFP were more abundant, such that the difference in total co-precipitating EP4 receptor was insignificant (less than 20% in duplicate experiments). Thus, the relative degree of interaction between EP receptors and the arrestin chimeras suggested by co-precipitation parallels the effects of the two arrestins on agonist-promoted internalization and desensitization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the difference in the amount of EP4 receptor co-precipitating with ARR2-GFP versus ARR2(R169E)-GFP was minimal. Whereas a greater amount of the EP4 receptor migrating at ϳ55 kDa was observed to coprecipitate with ARR2(R169E)-GFP, aggregates of the receptor (migrating at ϳ100 -150-kDa oligomers (49)) that co-precipitated with ARR2-GFP were more abundant, such that the difference in total co-precipitating EP4 receptor was insignificant (less than 20% in duplicate experiments). Thus, the relative degree of interaction between EP receptors and the arrestin chimeras suggested by co-precipitation parallels the effects of the two arrestins on agonist-promoted internalization and desensitization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This classical model of GRK2 action predicts that GRK2 reduction would enhance EP4-mediated signaling, leading to a stronger cAMP response and increased PKA activation (Ribas et al, 2007). There is indeed evidence that human EP4 receptors can be phosphorylated by GRK2 (Neuschäfer-Rube et al, 1999). Conversely, PGE 2 -induced cAMP production in smooth muscle cells is unaffected in conditions of low GRK2 (Kong et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These observations extend to the eicosanoid receptors. The importance of the C-terminal region of the EP-4 receptor for PGE 2 (57) in sequestration has been reported. Furthermore, ␣ and ␤ isoforms of the TP receptor that differ only in their C-terminal regions demonstrate strikingly different rates of agonist-induced internalization (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%