2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agile Software Development – Adoption and Maturity: An Activity Theory Perspective

Abstract: Abstract. This paper suggests that Activity Theory is a useful lens for examining aspects of agile software development adoption and maturity. Implementing agile approaches is influenced by many factors and attention is focused on individual and collective software development activity within an organisation's socially constructed environment. The research aim is to examine specific organisational, historical, cultural and social hindrances and facilitators that impact individual and collective learning opport… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CHAT offers a philosophical and cross-disciplinary perspective that is used as both experimental and analytic method in different settings and to elaborate with different units of analysis (as in our case individuals, teams, organizations and between organizations). The theory has been used in software development contexts (Vakkayil, 2010; Chita, 2018; Chita, Cruickshank, Smith, & Richards, 2020). We will use CHAT as a frame of analysis by reveling the ASs new models enters and express potential contradictions and tensions that give rise to dilemmas that either enhance or restrict learning on the organizational level.…”
Section: Learning Systems and Reflective Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHAT offers a philosophical and cross-disciplinary perspective that is used as both experimental and analytic method in different settings and to elaborate with different units of analysis (as in our case individuals, teams, organizations and between organizations). The theory has been used in software development contexts (Vakkayil, 2010; Chita, 2018; Chita, Cruickshank, Smith, & Richards, 2020). We will use CHAT as a frame of analysis by reveling the ASs new models enters and express potential contradictions and tensions that give rise to dilemmas that either enhance or restrict learning on the organizational level.…”
Section: Learning Systems and Reflective Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed cognition explains collaborative work practices as distributed and cognitively enhancing activities taking place among team members [74], [75]. As such it seems like a very powerful tool in our arsenal to make sense of the many potential cognitively-enhancing interactions that happens at several stages (both in presence and online) in the development of software programs.…”
Section: Distributed Cognition and Communication Channels In Software Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a strategic process in many organizations, an agile software process is influenced by various factors such as size of team, geographical situation, size and complexity of software, type of project, business strategy, engineering capability of the team, and cultural values 9,28–30 . Hence, full achievement of agility, a complete adoption of agile practices is still not perfected yet.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many organizations are now implementing agile practices like daily stand ups, short iterations, sprint planning, retrospectives, sprint review, and test‐driven techniques; however, the adoption of agile approaches to market conditions is still evolving and maturing. Specific organizational and structural factors, internal operations and processes, and even culture and social values may have effects on the implementation of agile software process and the maturity level of an organization 9 . Because of the fact that software processes are mainly human based, changes performed on a software process may result with significant costs which should be considered carefully (Münch et al, 2012) 69 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%