2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9457(02)00154-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
98
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
98
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In older subjects, Sparrow et al (2002) found results that were similar to those of young adults in terms of walking speed; there were no significant differences or interactions in walking speed between the unconstrained walking and targeting task and between the baseline walking and dual-task. As well, there were no significant differences in walking speeds between young and older adults.…”
Section: Older Adultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In older subjects, Sparrow et al (2002) found results that were similar to those of young adults in terms of walking speed; there were no significant differences or interactions in walking speed between the unconstrained walking and targeting task and between the baseline walking and dual-task. As well, there were no significant differences in walking speeds between young and older adults.…”
Section: Older Adultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Previous studies have confirmed that locomotion is not traditionally considered to be automatic, but instead requires minimal attentional resources to maintain or regain gait stability (Lajoie et al 1993;Lajoie et al 1996;Ebersbach et al 1995;Sparrow et al 2002;Beauchet et al 2005). Increased attentional resources may be required while performing a more challenging task such as obstacle avoidance with a secondary task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A growing body of literature is showing that maintaining or regaining gait stability requires attentional resources, which provides additional evidence to support the concept that walking is not automatic but requires attentional resources (Lajoie et al 1993;Lajoie et al 1996;Sparrow et al 2002;Beauchet et al 2005). Attentional resources are assumed to be limited (Neumann 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These negative consequences on mobility and safety are greater in older than in young adults, and suggest that walking is no longer automatic with aging: it requires additional attentional resources (e.g., Laessoe et al, 2008;Sheridan and Hausdorff, 2007) and the involvement of executive functions (for reviews, see Al-Yahya et al, 2011;Beurskens and Bock, 2012). Older adults have been shown to place priority on motor control during dual-task walking, so as to avoid falling but at the expense of walking speed (Hollman et al, 2007) or talking (for a review, see Beurskens and Bock, 2012;Sparrow et al, 2002). In this line, the greater declines of executive functions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (da Costa et al, 2013) may be why these medical conditions are strongly associated with a higher risk of falling (Delbaere et al, 2012;Sheridan and Hausdorff, 2007), a higher risk of being injured during street crossing (Gorrie et al, 2008) and navigation difficulties in real-life or simulator studies (e.g., Kliegel et al, 2007;Salthouse and Siedlecki, 2007;Taillade et al, 2013).…”
Section: Impact Of Cognitive Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%