1960
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4894(60)90086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age, strain and sex differences in susceptibility to Cysticercus fasciolaris in the mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results oppose the findings of Blázquez et al [57] that describe no in vivo susceptibility to an IP SAAR-1776 challenge in mice. The number of cell passages or the mouse species as well as the age difference could explain this [58]: Blázquez et al used eight-week-old Swiss mice [57] while we used four-week-old mice. Other unknown factors may eventually explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results oppose the findings of Blázquez et al [57] that describe no in vivo susceptibility to an IP SAAR-1776 challenge in mice. The number of cell passages or the mouse species as well as the age difference could explain this [58]: Blázquez et al used eight-week-old Swiss mice [57] while we used four-week-old mice. Other unknown factors may eventually explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three doses tested resulted in 100% mice mortality ( Table 2 ), which agreed with previous results. The differences in average survival time and mortality rates compared to previous studies, could be explained by differences in the passage history of viral strains, and the age of the infected mice [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The male sex hormone testosterone (Te) is known to promote a wide variety of diseases including different forms of cancer such as prostate-and hepatocarcinoma (Henderson et al 1982, Kemp, Leary & Drinkwater 1989 as well as to aggravate the course and outcome of infectious diseases by parasites (Alexander & Stimson 1988). Indeed, there is vast literature available that Te increases the susceptibility of vertebrate hosts towards many different protozoan parasites (Kierszenbaum et al , Dubey, Hoover & Walls 1977, Greenblatt & Rosenstreich 1984 and helminthic endoparasites (Dow & Jarrett 1960, Dobson 1962, Miller 1965, Ohbayashi & Sakamoto 1966, Charniga et al 1981, Bone & Bottjer 1986. Te even increases the susceptibility towards arthropod ectoparasites such as ticks (Ali & Sweatman 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%