2018
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101445
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The DNA methylation age, a good reflection of human aging process, has been used to predict chronological age of adults and newborns. However, the prediction model for children and adolescents was absent. In this study, we aimed to generate a prediction model of chronological age for children and adolescents aged 6-17 years by using age-specific DNA methylation patterns from 180 Chinese twin individuals. We identified 6,350 age-related CpGs from the epigenome-wide association analysis (N=179). 116 known age-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not see any increased enrichment of age-related CpGs identified in previous childhood and adolescent studies with advancing age in our models (all P values > 0. 19), making it unlikely that our results represent a strong effect of age [69,70].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We did not see any increased enrichment of age-related CpGs identified in previous childhood and adolescent studies with advancing age in our models (all P values > 0. 19), making it unlikely that our results represent a strong effect of age [69,70].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Based on information in the section above, developing a proxy measure of biological aging for humans still requires work but is a very dynamic and promising area of investigation with strong potential for translation. Some of the measures described-namely mitochondrial function, DNA methylation, and, to a lesser extent, cellular senescence and autophagy-are ready to be implemented based on several epidemiological studies, although refinements are always possible Choi et al, 2016;Cohen, Morissette-Thomas, Ferrucci, & Fried, 2016;Jylhävä, Pedersen, & Hägg, 2017;Jylhävä et al, 2014;Kananen et al, 2016;Kent & Fitzgerald, 2016;Kim & Jazwinski, 2015;Levine et al, 2018;Li et al, 2018;Marioni et al, 2019;Marttila et al, 2015;Putin et al, 2017;Sillanpää et al, 2018). Measures of telomere length are hampered by noise and wide longitudinal variations that cannot be explained by health events and at this stage are not useful for measuring biological age (Arai et al, 2015;Jodczyk, Fergusson, Horwood, Pearson, & Kennedy, 2014;Tomaska & Nosek, 2009).…”
Section: Connec Ting the B I Ology Of Ag Ing With Ag E-a Sso Ciatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our models perform better in young subjects but poorly for elders over 60 years old. We suppose that the deviation might attribute to the fact that adults and elders suffer from more confounding factors in the aspect of medication, smoking, or alcohol, which are not easily accessible for children and adolescents, as previously reported [14]. Another possible reason might be the smaller sample size included in our study especially elder samples, which leads to bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Hence, several sites of gene ELOVL2 is believed to be the most hopeful locus for age prediction [13]. An age prediction model of 83 newly CpG sites identified through Epigenome-wide association analysis with a correlation of 0.99 and the error of 0.23 years indicated that the chronological age can be accurately predicted among children and adolescents using DNA methylation biomarker [14]. Although a DNA methylation-based age prediction method can be developed in a way relatively high accuracy for individual age estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%