2003
DOI: 10.1375/136905203322296610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age- and Sex-differences in the Validity of Questionnaire-based Zygosity in Twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
190
2
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
190
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Zygosity was ascertained by the twins and their parents' reporting of physical similarity. Both twin and parental ratings of zygosity have been previously validated against DNA markers [9,11,12]. We have also used a questionnaire with acceptable validity and reliability to evaluate LBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zygosity was ascertained by the twins and their parents' reporting of physical similarity. Both twin and parental ratings of zygosity have been previously validated against DNA markers [9,11,12]. We have also used a questionnaire with acceptable validity and reliability to evaluate LBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zygosity was determined using similarity questions, a method which has been shown to provide at least 95% agreement with blood typing (Martin & Martin, 1975;Christensen et al, 2003). In both samples, women are slightly overrepresented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zygosity Zygosity of the twins in the Danish Twin Registry had previously been assigned on the basis of physical resemblance, which provided >95% accuracy of classification [12], but zygosity of those included in the study was confirmed using 12 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers. Identity in all markers indicated >0.99 probability of monozygosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%