2013
DOI: 10.1068/i0622sas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against Better Knowledge: The Magical Force of Amodal Volume Completion

Abstract: In a popular magic routine known as “multiplying billiard balls”, magicians fool their audience by using an empty shell that the audience believes to be a complete ball. Here, we present some observations suggesting that the spectators do not merely entertain the intellectual belief that the balls are all solid, but rather automatically and immediately perceive them as such. Our observations demonstrate the surprising potency and genuinely perceptual origin of amodal volume completion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a well-known magic trick known as multiplying balls, conjurers fool their audience with the use of a semi-spherical shell, which the audience perceives as a complete ball [1]. Here, we report that this illusion persists even when observers touch the inside of the shell with their own finger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In a well-known magic trick known as multiplying balls, conjurers fool their audience with the use of a semi-spherical shell, which the audience perceives as a complete ball [1]. Here, we report that this illusion persists even when observers touch the inside of the shell with their own finger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…According to Thomas and Didierjean (,b; Barnhart, ; see also Beth & Ekroll, ; Ekroll et al ., ; Ekroll & Wagemans, ; Kuhn & Rensink, ) during a magic trick, participants’ susceptibility to the illusion often relies on their capacity to reduce the dissonance between what they saw and what they expected to see. To reduce this dissonance, some participants could prioritize their beliefs and ignore some perceptual feedback (see Thomas & Didierjean, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our perceptual experiences are influenced by our past experiences and expectations (see Hubbard, ; Intraub & Richardson, ; O'Regan, Rensink, & Clark, ; Simons & Chabris, ), and according to Kahneman (), the attribute substitution heuristic might also underpin some our perceptual experiences. For example, theories on amodal completion (Ekroll, Sayim, Van der Hallen, & Wagemans, ; Ekroll, Sayim, & Wagemans, ; Kanisza & Gerbino, ; Michotte, Thinés, & Crabbe, suggest that we have a natural tendency to use prior knowledge to fill in things we do not directly perceive. In other words, our perceptual system automatically substitutes the target attribute ‘what is visible and not occluded’ with the heuristic attribute ‘what (partially occluded) objects are constructed through amodal completion’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, many magic tricks are based on visual or cognitive illusions (e.g., Macknik, Martinez-Conde, & Blakeslee, 2010). Investigating how magicians use such illusions in practice may lead to new insights in perception and cognition (Ekroll, Sayim, and Wagemans, 2013). Furthermore, some magic tricks force photographers using high resolution video cameras.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%