2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afterpulse and delayed crosstalk analysis on a STMicroelectronics silicon photomultiplier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6, we obtained the best-fit of our F measurements with k = 3.2 × 10 −2 up to OV = 5.5 V. Such a choice for k provides P values that are comparable to what previously reported in literature. For example, at OV = 3 V, P is 16.1% (i.e., 12.8% + 3.3%, sum of crosstalk and afterpulsing probabilities, respectively) in [43], while it results 28% in our analysis. Fig.…”
Section: B Snr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6, we obtained the best-fit of our F measurements with k = 3.2 × 10 −2 up to OV = 5.5 V. Such a choice for k provides P values that are comparable to what previously reported in literature. For example, at OV = 3 V, P is 16.1% (i.e., 12.8% + 3.3%, sum of crosstalk and afterpulsing probabilities, respectively) in [43], while it results 28% in our analysis. Fig.…”
Section: B Snr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Even if the crosstalk probability can be only slightly higher than the afterpulsing probability, it is important to focus on their charge contributions. Indeed, the charge contribution of the former is about four times the charge contribution of the latter [43]. …”
Section: B Snr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, we have constructed a statistical model accounting for AP-traps, CT-diff and AP-diff, and preliminary measurements to validate it are shown. A similar analysis of afterpulsing and CT-diff in a STMicroelectronics SiPM has recently been presented in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Only the general aspects are given below. 2 The f(t) distribution for AP-traps was characterized by the product of three factors: a negative exponential distribution describing the release of trapped carriers; the exponential pixel recharging after the primary avalanche, which is proportional to both the gain and the probability of the secondary avalanche; and the t-dependent fraction of afterpulses (of any type) with amplitudes above the detection threshold applied in the analysis software. The last two factors, which are also applicable to the f(t) distribution for AP-diff, account for the steep break of the experimental time distribution between 20 and 30 ns (see Fig.…”
Section: Afterpulsing and Delayed Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to obtain required BER in practice, which can block almost all of the AP events because high-order AP probability reduces sharply. Secondly, the time constant of AP is usually larger than tens of nanoseconds, 24 which is distributed in many time bins, so each bit has very few APs and the APs can be easily eliminated by the threshold of the equalizer. The delayed OC events have similar time distribution with APs, so it can be treated the same as APs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%