2009
DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295-7.5.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After “eco” comes “service”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 278 students participated in the survey, and more than half (58.3%) said they were not involved in “Earth stewardship” activities. This finding is consistent with results from a previous survey (Salguero‐Gomez et al 2009) that found that 77% of students ( N = 260) thought that these types of activities were the least important. It is encouraging to know that 87.9% of the students who conduct these activities do it because they think it's important.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…A total of 278 students participated in the survey, and more than half (58.3%) said they were not involved in “Earth stewardship” activities. This finding is consistent with results from a previous survey (Salguero‐Gomez et al 2009) that found that 77% of students ( N = 260) thought that these types of activities were the least important. It is encouraging to know that 87.9% of the students who conduct these activities do it because they think it's important.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Because of their globally distributed and online nature, GCIPs are especially well suited to survey international communities. International surveys provide means to inform the debate on what would otherwise be national issues, such as curricula reform in higher education (Salguero-Gómez et al 2008, Zimmerman et al 2009). For example, the YES Network conducted one survey on the unique challenges women face as geoscientists, and another assessing the impact major career moves on the lives of geoscientists.…”
Section: Benefits Of An Early Career Gcip For the Ecological Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broaden benchmarks of success and merit in ecology: Traditional university training emphasizes ''pure'' research and quantitative benchmarks of success (e.g., publication impact factors) (Lawrence 2003). This is incompatible with measuring efficacy in action ecology, for which effective and impactful solutions may not meet traditional standards of scientific value (Morgan et al 2008, Salguero-Gómez et al 2009). Action ecologists may have an impact that is not well captured by their number of publications, grant support awarded, or number of students graduated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%