2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-005-9140-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AFPep: an anti-breast cancer peptide that is orally active

Abstract: Chronic oral administration of AFPep appears to be safe and effective for the treatment or prevention of breast cancer in animal models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doses of AFPep (100 mg animal À1 day À1 ;) or of Tam (0.05 mg animal À1 day À1 ) given to the rats were held constant during the 20-day treatment interval. During this interval, all animals in all groups gained In all previous work with high doses of AFPep, no evidence of toxicity or side effects has been detected (Mesfin et al, 2001;Bennett et al, 2002Bennett et al, , 2006Parikh et al, 2005). In this study in which AFPep or combination of AFPep and Tam were administered to rats at therapeutic doses for 2 -3 weeks, there was no effect on body weight, fur texture, or cage activity during the lifespan of the animals, or on organ weights obtained at necropsy (Table 1).…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Doses of AFPep (100 mg animal À1 day À1 ;) or of Tam (0.05 mg animal À1 day À1 ) given to the rats were held constant during the 20-day treatment interval. During this interval, all animals in all groups gained In all previous work with high doses of AFPep, no evidence of toxicity or side effects has been detected (Mesfin et al, 2001;Bennett et al, 2002Bennett et al, , 2006Parikh et al, 2005). In this study in which AFPep or combination of AFPep and Tam were administered to rats at therapeutic doses for 2 -3 weeks, there was no effect on body weight, fur texture, or cage activity during the lifespan of the animals, or on organ weights obtained at necropsy (Table 1).…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Figure 1A In data not shown, it was apparent that, at concentrations ranging from 10 À8 to 10 À5 M, neither Tam nor AFPep inhibited the basal (no E 2 ) growth of T47D cells, suggesting that their action was directed mainly to the E 2 stimulation of these cells and was not a nonspecific toxic effect. Also, a control peptide of scrambled sequence did not inhibit the E 2 -stimulated or basal growth of these cells (Bennett et al, 2006) Although T47D cells were quite responsive to E 2 in cell culture, these cells were less reliable when grown as a xenograft in immune-deficient mice, having a take rate (i.e., successful growth) of o60% when implanted in 20 of these mice. In contrast, we have found the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line to have a tumour take rate of 100% in immune-deficient mice and to be completely dependent on E 2 for growth in these mice.…”
Section: Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations