2016
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/34/34lt01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity- and topology-dependent bound on current fluctuations

Abstract: Abstract. We provide a proof of a recently conjectured universal bound on current fluctuations in Markovian processes. This bound establishes a link between the fluctuations of an individual observable current, the cycle affinities driving the system into a non-equilibrium steady state, and the topology of the network. The proof is based on a decomposition of the network into independent cycles with both positive affinity and positive stationary cycle current. This formalism allows for a refinement of the boun… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While empirical currents are the natural trajectory observables to consider in driven problems [1][2][3][4][5]29,30,33,35,36,40], counting observables such as the dynamical activity are central quantities for systems with complex equilibrium dynamics, such as glass formers [24,25,42,43,46]. (And even for driven systems it is revealing to study the dynamical phase behavior in terms of both empirical currents and activities; see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While empirical currents are the natural trajectory observables to consider in driven problems [1][2][3][4][5]29,30,33,35,36,40], counting observables such as the dynamical activity are central quantities for systems with complex equilibrium dynamics, such as glass formers [24,25,42,43,46]. (And even for driven systems it is revealing to study the dynamical phase behavior in terms of both empirical currents and activities; see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As occurs with the analogous bounds on time-integrated currents [1][2][3][4], an immediate consequence of the bounds on the rate function or cumulant generating function are the thermodynamic uncertainty relations [13][14][15]. From Eq.…”
Section: Level 25 and Fluctuation Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-independent parameters K ij are anti-symmetric, i.e., K ij =−K ji , and satisfy å = ¹ ( ) K 0, 51 j i ij for all states i. Using this choice in equation (47), we obtain , where * s is defined in equation (20). For currents with time-independent increments α ij (t)=α ij , we obtain…”
Section: First Global Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key feature of this parabolic bound is that it depends solely on the average entropy production and the average current, i.e., knowledge of the average entropy production and the average current implies a bound on arbitrary fluctuations of any thermodynamic current. There has been much recent work related to this universal principle about current fluctuations [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works about the TUR and quadratic bounds on LD rate functionals have already been produced (see for example [1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 19, 20, 23, This work has been supported by Italian PRIN 20155PAWZB "Large Scale Random Structures" and by the project "Investissements d'Avenir" UCA JEDI of the French ANR n. ANR-15-IDEX-01. 24,26,27,28,29,32,33,34,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] and references therein). In particular, the TUR applies to systems driven by a fixed thermodynamic force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%