2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237003.24294.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction with Inferior Wedge Resection and Superior Pedicle Flap Reconstruction

Abstract: The results of this study demonstrate that inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction is a simple and consistent technique and deserves a place among the main procedures available. The complications observed were not unexpected and did not extend hospital stay or interfere with the normal postoperative period. The success of the procedure depends on patient selection, careful preoperative planning, and adequate intraoperative management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
107
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Other studies have similarly been limited to functional and physical results of FGPS. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Bramwell et al 16 utilized semi-structured interviews to gain insight about psychological well-being of participants; their results revealed important individual variations in motivation, access, and response to surgery that were not detected in earlier research. In particular, most women initially reported feeling their genitals were "abnormal" and expressed the goal of achieving a "normal" (to them) genital appearance as the main reason for surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Other studies have similarly been limited to functional and physical results of FGPS. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Bramwell et al 16 utilized semi-structured interviews to gain insight about psychological well-being of participants; their results revealed important individual variations in motivation, access, and response to surgery that were not detected in earlier research. In particular, most women initially reported feeling their genitals were "abnormal" and expressed the goal of achieving a "normal" (to them) genital appearance as the main reason for surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical discomfort and cosmetic concerns are frequently combined, and many women relate feelings of vaginal and perineal laxity detrimental to coital enjoyment and orgasmic facility. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Female genital plastic/cosmetic surgery (FGPS) has been developed in response to women's desires to modify the appearance and function of their vulvas and vaginas. A growing literature is accumulating regarding the rationale for choosing FGPS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies of labiaplasties reveal high rates of overall satisfaction, including improved self-esteem [16][17][18][19]. In the absence of any head-to-head comparative trials presently, recommendations cannot be made that which technique provides the best cosmetic results.…”
Section: Labiaplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen of the 18 papers presented as case reports or case series with no description of methodology or study design and, of these, three alluded to the use of nonstandardised questionnaires given out to patients. 11,13,16 Three of the 18 papers were reviews of retrospective notes and, of these, one was combined with a clinical examination and nonstandardised questionnaire with no description of tool development. 7 Follow-up methodology Nine papers presented follow-up data, with the length of follow-up unspecified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 21, 18 were reports of surgical procedures. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The remaining three papers were as follows: one qualitative study of patient experience after labial reduction, 20 one study of patient indications for surgery, 21 and one survey of women's attitudes to their labia. 22 Of the remaining 19 of the 40 publications that did not include surgical results, one was a description of a technique, 23 five were letters on points relating to the surgical technique, [24][25][26][27][28] and three were discussions of the surgical technique.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%