1986
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1986.03780010052009
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Blom-Singer Low-Pressure Voice Prostheses

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
15
4
0
0

Citation Types

0
7
0
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
17
2

Relationship

0
19

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 19 publications

(7 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

0
7
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, voice and speech restoration by tracheoesophageal speech is achieved at a higher success rate as compared to esophageal speech 8. With the introduction of low‐pressure shunt valves,9–11 additional myotomy of the cricopharyngeal and lower pharyngeal constrictor muscles have improved these results even further 12–14…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, voice and speech restoration by tracheoesophageal speech is achieved at a higher success rate as compared to esophageal speech 8. With the introduction of low‐pressure shunt valves,9–11 additional myotomy of the cricopharyngeal and lower pharyngeal constrictor muscles have improved these results even further 12–14…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Nowadays, all voice prostheses are so-called low-resistance devices. The differences between these devices have been measured in vitro [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . It is more challenging to measure voice prosthesis performance in the patient.…”
Section: In Vivo and In Vitro Prosthesis Differences
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…for a complete chronology of voice-prosthesis evolution). Briefly, the evolution has progressed from a hand-fabricated prosthesis with a slit in its tip forming a one-way ''duckbill'' valve without a retention collar 3 to a commercially available 16-Frdiameter duckbill device first without 2 and then with 6 a circular retention collar, followed by a 16-Fr-diameter prosthesis with a beveled tip incorporating an internal, one-way, hinged flap valve 7,8 and then its 20-Fr-diameter counterpart. 4 All of the above prostheses required teaching the user to safely and periodically, eg, every 3-4 days, change the prosthesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%