2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13272-019-00417-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic angle estimation: comparison between numerical results and operative environment data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section results related to flight manoeuvres FT#1–4 are presented because they give a real feedback on the VS performances. The training results are only used for training purposes, e.g., to select the best training among several ones according to consolidated metrics, as showed in previous works [20] and not reported in this paper. Results will be presented as time histories of the errors whereas the current values are not shown for intellectual property reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section results related to flight manoeuvres FT#1–4 are presented because they give a real feedback on the VS performances. The training results are only used for training purposes, e.g., to select the best training among several ones according to consolidated metrics, as showed in previous works [20] and not reported in this paper. Results will be presented as time histories of the errors whereas the current values are not shown for intellectual property reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtual sensors are compared in terms of measurement uncertainty required to COTS or MFP probes from Table 2. However, the Smart-ADAHRS technology has been already compared with vanes in [20] without providing any particular evidence of degradation of the ADS performance. However, this analysis will be conducted in future dedicated experiments.…”
Section: Midas Technological Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Model-free virtual sensors for the angle of attack measurement are available in the literature, too. They mainly use neural networks [15], [16], which has the drawback to need huge amount of data for the training of the network. This paper is an extension of the work presented in [1], which describes an innovative approach to estimate the angle of attack, developed and patented [17] by the Italian Aerospace Research Centre (CIRA) and ASPEN Avionics.…”
Section: Astesj Issn: 2415-6698mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, in this field a synthetic sensor (also called virtual sensor) is an estimator able to provide AOA and/or AOS with an sufficiently high accuracy without the support of dedicated protruding probes, although it might use other protruding probes such as a Pitot probe for the measurement of the total pressure. In the past, researchers applied several techniques to obtain a synthetic sensor for AOA and AOS, for instance several studies exist on the application of Kalman Filter (KF) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], other studies focus on the application of Neural Network (NN) [9][10][11], while the mathematical description of the problem resulting in an analytical estimator independent from the aircraft have been published in [12]. Another important research topic is the wind estimation, which is tighly related to the estimation of AOA/AOS [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%