2023
DOI: 10.3354/esr01234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial hearing thresholds and ecoacoustics of a threatened pursuit-diving seabird, the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus

Abstract: As humans increasingly utilize sensitive coastal areas, diving seabirds like the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus face a unique combination of exposure to pervasive anthropogenic sound and acoustically mediated disturbances in terrestrial and marine environments. Despite its threatened status, the sound sensitivities and sensory ecology of this species are unknown, limiting any predictions of the frequencies or sound levels that may induce acoustic impacts. In this study, we measured electrophysiologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2020), down to 13 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-3.5 kHz range in the common murre ( Uria aalge ; Smith et al . 2023a), and down to 17 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-3.5 kHz range for the marbled murrelet ( Brachyramphus marmoratus ; Smith et al . 2023b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2020), down to 13 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-3.5 kHz range in the common murre ( Uria aalge ; Smith et al . 2023a), and down to 17 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-3.5 kHz range for the marbled murrelet ( Brachyramphus marmoratus ; Smith et al . 2023b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…across species, namely down to 10-20 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-2.5 kHz frequency range for the Atlantic puffin(Mooney et al 2020), down to 13 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-3.5 kHz range in the common murre (Uria aalge;Smith et al 2023a), and down to 17 dB re 20 µPa in the 1-3.5 kHz range for the marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus;Smith et al 2023b). We chose 1000 m as the maximum propagation distance, with calculated ASPL at this distance roughly corresponding to the minimum physiological hearing threshold (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%