2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18124311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial Coverage Analysis of Cellular Systems at LTE and mmWave Frequencies Using 3D City Models

Abstract: Cellular connectivity for UAV systems is interesting because it promises coverage in beyond visual line of sight scenarios. Inter-cell interference has been shown to be the main limiting factor at high altitudes. Using a realistic 3D simulator model, with real base station locations, this study confirms that UAVs at high altitudes suffer from significant interference, resulting in a worse coverage compared to ground users. When replacing the existing base stations by mmWave cells, our results indicate that gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 We note that since the channel between the UAV and the ground terminals are LoS dominated [22], [23], [26], the UAVs would fly at the lowest allowable flight altitude to obtain a higher channel gain for maximizing the system energy efficiency. Thus, we consider a fixed UAVs' flight altitude of H = 100 m. 4 Based on field measurements [28], [29], the air-to-ground links between the UAVs and the ground terminals are LoS channels in rural areas when the flight altitude of a UAV is 100 meters and the length of side of the service area is 500 meters. Besides, the adopted LoS model can facilitate the design of resource allocation and trajectory in the sequel.…”
Section: B Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 We note that since the channel between the UAV and the ground terminals are LoS dominated [22], [23], [26], the UAVs would fly at the lowest allowable flight altitude to obtain a higher channel gain for maximizing the system energy efficiency. Thus, we consider a fixed UAVs' flight altitude of H = 100 m. 4 Based on field measurements [28], [29], the air-to-ground links between the UAVs and the ground terminals are LoS channels in rural areas when the flight altitude of a UAV is 100 meters and the length of side of the service area is 500 meters. Besides, the adopted LoS model can facilitate the design of resource allocation and trajectory in the sequel.…”
Section: B Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the wireless channels from a UAV to the ground user/Eve on each subcarrier are LoS-dominated and we adopt the commonly used free-space path loss model 4 as in [6]- 4 We note that field measurements [30] suggest that air-to-ground links are almost guaranteed to be LoS channels in rural areas when a UAV flies with an altitude of 100 meters or above to serve a cell with a radius of 500 meters. Furthermore, the aviation altitude of a UAV can be adjusted according to the type of terrain and the scale of the cells, which can guarantee that the air-to-ground channel LoS probability approaches one [31].…”
Section: Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the solution derived in (30) from other users on subcarrier i in time slot n. According to the KKT conditions [42], the following equality holds at the optimal point of the problem in (21):…”
Section: A Subproblem 1: Communication Resource Allocation Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a two-way ground level model is considered with an average LTE BS effective height of m [ 50 ] and an average NB-IoT elevation level of m for most NB-IoT urban applications scenarios [ 51 ].…”
Section: The Proposed Intelligent Mixed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%