2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492007000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse reactions of fluorescein angiography: a prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
47
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
47
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Nausea rates of 0.7% (3) , 2.9% (4) and 6.83% were found (1) . In another study the subgroup of diabetic patients experienced the highest nausea rate in more than 15% of the angiograms (5) , but hypertensive and elderly patients did not show increase in such reactions (6) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nausea rates of 0.7% (3) , 2.9% (4) and 6.83% were found (1) . In another study the subgroup of diabetic patients experienced the highest nausea rate in more than 15% of the angiograms (5) , but hypertensive and elderly patients did not show increase in such reactions (6) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In another study the subgroup of diabetic patients experienced the highest nausea rate in more than 15% of the angiograms (5) , but hypertensive and elderly patients did not show increase in such reactions (6) . Previous adverse reactions seems to be a powerful risk factor for future exams (1,2,4) . Some authors claim rates of complications as high as 48.6% when patient had experienced symptoms in a prior angiography (4) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used angiography methods include fluorescein angiography (FA) [1] and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) [2]. However, these angiography methods are invasive and require dye injection into the human body, which can occasionally have adverse effects [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current standard retinal imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography or fluorescein angiography (FA) are widely used to provide information on healthy and diseased vascular structures [6]. However, these technologies fail to visualize the finest capillary network due to limited imaging resolution, or involve the invasive use of contrast agents, which may be associated with the risk of adverse reactions [7,8]. More importantly, the aforementioned techniques do not generally provide information about parafoveal capillary hemodynamics, which may be essential for best prediction of future development of vascular pathology over the chronic course of diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%