2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42991-021-00101-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse effects of noise pollution on foraging and drinking behaviour of insectivorous desert bats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This response indicates that P. pipistrellus are still able to forage in conditions where acute noise pollution is present, potentially a result of their habituation to anthropogenic stressors due to their prevalence within urban environments or a result of their terminal phase calls (feeding buzzes) being of a higher frequency range than those found on music tracks. In contrast to our findings, Domer et al (2021) found that acute loud music reduced both the overall activity and foraging success of Pipistrellus kuhlii,…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This response indicates that P. pipistrellus are still able to forage in conditions where acute noise pollution is present, potentially a result of their habituation to anthropogenic stressors due to their prevalence within urban environments or a result of their terminal phase calls (feeding buzzes) being of a higher frequency range than those found on music tracks. In contrast to our findings, Domer et al (2021) found that acute loud music reduced both the overall activity and foraging success of Pipistrellus kuhlii,…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This response indicates that P. pipistrellus are still able to forage in conditions where acute noise pollution is present, potentially a result of their habituation to anthropogenic stressors due to their prevalence within urban environments or a result of their terminal phase calls (feeding buzzes) being of a higher frequency range than those found on music tracks. In contrast to our findings, Domer et al (2021) found that acute loud music reduced both the overall activity and foraging success of Pipistrellus kuhlii , while Hypsugo ariel showed an increase in unsuccessful drinking buzzes of 57% post‐music playback despite no significant variance in bat activity pre and post music. This highlights the potential disconnect between the number of bat passes and drinking or foraging success, as well as the species‐specific responses to acute noise pollution such as loud music.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a task is difficult and attention-demanding, foraging performance can be constrained and the detection of threats may be hindered (Dukas and Kamil, 2000). Noise has also been suggested to act as a distractor and narrow the attention in bats, whereby it reduces hunting performance in biosonar-mediated prey capture and drinking (Allen et al, 2021;Domer et al, 2021). For porpoises, it is plausible that attention on biosonar-mediated prey capture could similarly reduce vigilance to predators or fishing nets.…”
Section: Ecological Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the same time, man-made structures, such as buildings, roofs and tunnels (artificial roosts) with their warmer microclimatic conditions, may benefit species which are not necessarily dependent upon tree roosts 19 . In addition, urban anthropogenic noise may affect the foraging success for some species, as noise frequencies often overlap with the frequencies of sounds emitted by bat prey 3,[26][27][28] . Similarly, noise might affect communication with conspecifics by masking some bat species' social calls 26 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%