2019
DOI: 10.37358/rc.19.4.7115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages of Negative Pressure Therapy in Local Diabetic Foot Treatment

Abstract: Diabetic foot is a current public health problem and a late consequence of diabetes. Morbidity and mortality are significant, seriously affecting the patient�s quality of life. Treatment of the diabetic foot is a long-lasting, highly resource-consumption process. Using negative pressure therapy leads to shorter hospitalization periods, better functional outcomes, significantly contributes to decreasing the number of amputations and improving patient�s quality of life. 49 year-old patient is hospitalized with n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hospitals are a critical component of the antimicrobial resistance problem worldwide [2], in the condition in which hospital acquired infections (HAIs) have been shown to occur about 5 to 10 times more in the patients admitted in ICUs, which are critically ill patients [3][4][5][6][7][8]. A significant problem in intensive care units is constantly increasing resistance to these antibiotics, the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) being now considered a global public health threat [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospitals are a critical component of the antimicrobial resistance problem worldwide [2], in the condition in which hospital acquired infections (HAIs) have been shown to occur about 5 to 10 times more in the patients admitted in ICUs, which are critically ill patients [3][4][5][6][7][8]. A significant problem in intensive care units is constantly increasing resistance to these antibiotics, the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) being now considered a global public health threat [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of the subjects in the experimental group, we used specialized psychological support. Thus, we selected healthy, normal-weight young subjects (21-25 years old), without present morbidity (diabetes, especially with complications, oncological disease) [10][11][12][13], with stable eating patterns, without a history of bulimia, anorexia, recent diets or other psychological disorders that interfere with the nutritional status. Also, only subjects who showed compliance with maintaining the lifestyle during the experiment in terms of nutrition, physical activity regime, and exposure to daily stress were included.…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aimed to investigate the acute hemodynamic effects of caffeine intake versus placebo in a sample of 32 volunteers, healthy young adults, who were successively placed in distinct positions. The inclusion criteria in the experiment were: good health, common eating behaviour [15] normal BP values, with no significant pathological history in the last 6 months (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, various traumas or injuries, oncological conditions) [16][17][18], occasional consumption of coffee or caffeine-based products. Subjects who were afraid of posturing maneuvers or who did not like coffee were excluded.…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 99%