2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4412-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages and limitations for users of double pit pour-flush latrines: a qualitative study in rural Bangladesh

Abstract: BackgroundIn rural Bangladesh, India and elsewhere, pour-flush pit latrines are the most common sanitation system. When a single pit latrine becomes full, users must empty it themselves and risk exposure to fresh feces, pay an emptying service to remove pit contents or build a new latrine. Double pit pour-flush latrines may serve as a long-term sanitation option including high water table areas because the pits do not need to be emptied immediately and the excreta decomposes into reusable soil.MethodsDouble pi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sanitation intervention consisting of compound-level hygienic double-pit latrines and household-level sani-scoop hoes and child potties along with behavior promotion reduced Giardia prevalence and infection intensity [ 25–27 ]. These sanitation interventions likely disrupted key fecal–oral transmission pathways via safe containment and disposal of feces in the compound and household living environments, thereby reducing exposure of children to Giardia [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sanitation intervention consisting of compound-level hygienic double-pit latrines and household-level sani-scoop hoes and child potties along with behavior promotion reduced Giardia prevalence and infection intensity [ 25–27 ]. These sanitation interventions likely disrupted key fecal–oral transmission pathways via safe containment and disposal of feces in the compound and household living environments, thereby reducing exposure of children to Giardia [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard project intervention latrine was a double pit latrine with a water seal. 13 Each pit had five concrete rings that were 0·3 m high. When the initial pit filled, the superstructure and slab could be moved to the second pit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the study design are described elsewhere [ 6 ]. In summary, the interventions included free provision of enabling technologies as follows: an insulated drinking-water storage container [ 11 ] (Lion Star Plastics, Sri Lanka) for treated stored water; a sani-scoop (a locally developed tool made specifically for the trial, based on previous research [ 12 ] was used to remove feces from the household environment; a child’s potty [ 13 ] (RFL, Bangladesh) to minimize child open defecation in the household environment; double-pit pour-flush improved latrines [ 14 ] for hygienic feces containment; handwashing stations and soapy water storage bottles [ 15 ] (RFL Bangladesh). The following supplies were provided for the intervention: Aquatabs™ (Medentech, Wexford, Ireland) for water treatment, laundry detergent sachets for soapy water preparation and Lipid-based Nutrient Supplement (LNS; Nutriset, France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%