2022
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in screening and detection of gastric cancer

Abstract: With an estimated one million new cases and 769 000 deaths in 2020, gastric cancer is the fifth most frequent cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer death globally.Incidence rates are highest in Asia and Eastern Europe. This manuscript will review the current modalities of diagnosis, staging, and screening of gastric cancer. We will also highlight development of novel diagnostics and advancements in endoscopic detection of early gastric cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
35
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, we would like to offer some comments on the excellent review article "Advances in screening and detection of gastric cancer" by Jonathan Y. Xia and A. Aziz Aadam. 1 We fully agree that "serum tumor markers, including CEA, CA-125, CA 19-9 are of limited diagnostic utility" because of their limited sensitivity and specificity, but we suggest that serum pepsinogen II (PgII) is also an unsuitable marker for the identification of "patients with increased risk." 1 Not only does it, as the authors state, "lacks the sensitivity and specificity to provide any diagnostic value," but it is a marker of inflammation that does not provide any information on either GC risk or current gastric neoplasia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this respect, we would like to offer some comments on the excellent review article "Advances in screening and detection of gastric cancer" by Jonathan Y. Xia and A. Aziz Aadam. 1 We fully agree that "serum tumor markers, including CEA, CA-125, CA 19-9 are of limited diagnostic utility" because of their limited sensitivity and specificity, but we suggest that serum pepsinogen II (PgII) is also an unsuitable marker for the identification of "patients with increased risk." 1 Not only does it, as the authors state, "lacks the sensitivity and specificity to provide any diagnostic value," but it is a marker of inflammation that does not provide any information on either GC risk or current gastric neoplasia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1 We fully agree that "serum tumor markers, including CEA, CA-125, CA 19-9 are of limited diagnostic utility" because of their limited sensitivity and specificity, but we suggest that serum pepsinogen II (PgII) is also an unsuitable marker for the identification of "patients with increased risk." 1 Not only does it, as the authors state, "lacks the sensitivity and specificity to provide any diagnostic value," but it is a marker of inflammation that does not provide any information on either GC risk or current gastric neoplasia. 6 In contrast, the PgI/PgII ratio (not mentioned by the authors), while not a marker of existing cancer, may be helpful in detecting subjects with atrophy and, consequently, increased GC risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common digestive system malignancies associated with high incidence and mortality rate 1 . While great achievements have made major advances in screening, most GC patients were diagnosed with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease and remained to have a poor prognosis 2 , 3 . The metastasis of GC is the main cause of death for patients 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%