41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-3990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Simulation of Solid Propellant Rockets from First Principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The later objective can only be achieved by incorporating expert knowledge about characteristic dynamical features of various off-nominal regimes and by utilizing deep physical understanding of the underlying physical processes. Examples of the most probable faults in SRBs include: (i) combustion instabilities [1][2][3] , (ii) bore chocking [4][5][6] , and (iii) case breach [7][8][9] . Clearly the development of the FD&P that incorporates physics models of the faults has to verified and validated in a multi-stage procedure involving highfidelity modeling, ground and flying tests.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later objective can only be achieved by incorporating expert knowledge about characteristic dynamical features of various off-nominal regimes and by utilizing deep physical understanding of the underlying physical processes. Examples of the most probable faults in SRBs include: (i) combustion instabilities [1][2][3] , (ii) bore chocking [4][5][6] , and (iii) case breach [7][8][9] . Clearly the development of the FD&P that incorporates physics models of the faults has to verified and validated in a multi-stage procedure involving highfidelity modeling, ground and flying tests.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here it is sufficient to note that the fastest physical time scale is of the order of 10 À6 s while the slowest physical time scale is the time to burn-out of the solid propellant, which is about 120 s for the RSRM. The wide range of length and time scales makes detailed first-principle simulations of SRMs from ignition to burn-out, such as those undertaken at the Center for Simulation of Advanced Rockets (CSAR, see Dick et al [4]), very challenging. In such simulations, evolution equations are solved for the mass, momentum, and energy of the mixture of gaseous species and aluminum-oxide smoke and for the aluminum droplet position, mass, momentum, energy, and composition (see, e.g., Najjar et al [13] and Haselbacher and Najjar [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, theoretical analysis shows that many fault modes leading to the SRBs failures [5]- [7], including combustion instabilities [8]- [10], bore choking [11]- [13], and case breach [5], [14], have unique dynamical features in the time-traces of pressure and thrust. The corresponding expert knowledge can be incorporated into on-board FD&P within the novel Bayesian inferential framework [1]- [4] allowing for faster and more reliable identification of the nominal and off-nominal regimes of SRB operation in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%