2015
DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult education research between field and rhizome - a bibliometrical analysis of conference programs of ESREA

Abstract: Adult education research is frequently an own subject of research. Such research is often focused on the analysis of journals. This paper will instead analyse triennial research conferences of the European Society for the Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) between 1994 and 2013. The research was carried out mainly via a bibliometrical program analysis of conference papers. Results support previous findings in the analysis of adult education research, but a number of differences or blind spots of ESREA… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…En relación a los métodos utilizados en las investigaciones, el estudio de Käpplinger (2015) concluye en la hegemónica utilización de métodos cualitativos -básicamente entrevistas e historias de vida -y la presencia muy marginal de los llamados métodos cuantitativos acompañados de análisis estadísticos.…”
Section: Un Breve Apunte Sobre La Investigación En Educación De Persounclassified
“…En relación a los métodos utilizados en las investigaciones, el estudio de Käpplinger (2015) concluye en la hegemónica utilización de métodos cualitativos -básicamente entrevistas e historias de vida -y la presencia muy marginal de los llamados métodos cuantitativos acompañados de análisis estadísticos.…”
Section: Un Breve Apunte Sobre La Investigación En Educación De Persounclassified
“…Some of these studies focus on a single journal only and its development over time (e.g. Harris and Morrison 2011;St.Clair 2011;Taylor 2001), while others focus on identifying issues of authorship and content across several journals (Fejes and Nylander 2014;Larsson 2009Larsson , 2010Rubenson and Elfert 2015) and yet some focus on conference publications (Käpplinger 2015). In short, these studies identify the following characteristics of adult learning as a research field: authors located at universities in the UK, US, Australia or Canada dominate the field in contribution as well as collegial impact; female authors render more publications than men do, while male authors still dominate the field in terms of scientific recognition and impact (Fejes and Nylander 2015;Taylor 2001).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, these studies identify the following characteristics of adult learning as a research field: authors located at universities in the UK, US, Australia or Canada dominate the field in contribution as well as collegial impact; female authors render more publications than men do, while male authors still dominate the field in terms of scientific recognition and impact (Fejes and Nylander 2015;Taylor 2001). Methodologically, research tends to be conducted within the qualitative paradigm, with interviews, sometimes in combination with observations, as the main method of generating data (Fejes and Nylander 2015;Käpplinger 2015). Theoretically, sociocultural perspectives on learning dominate and topic-wise, adult learning has been found to be the most common thematic (Fejes and Nylander 2015;Rubenson and Elfert 2015).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing on the tradition of the sociology of science known as field analysis (Bourdieu 1988) we identify the dominating players based on the total number of citations, outline their positions in relation to one another and unravel the main epistemic traditions present in the field. Although we do not think that the total number of citations can be taken as a proxy for research quality, we believe that the bibliographic method we outline has a series of distinct advantages in comparison to conventional bibliometrics analysis (Hicks 2004(Hicks , 2013Persson 1991;Lariviére et al 2006) as well as previous bibliometrics studies on the field of adult learning (Fejes and Nylander 2015;Rubenson and Elfert 2015;Käpplinger 2015;Larsson 2010;Taylor 2001). Firstly, we are able to give a synthetic and panoramic view of the research field of adult learning based on previous citation patterns by utilizing the power of big data, spanning in total 151,261 citation links between more than 33,000 different authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%