1982
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(82)90129-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption and coadsorption of carbon monoxide and hydrogen on Pd(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
20
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate coefficient of CO desorption from the noble metal (backward reaction in step 1) is very low in the present study compared to the value reported by Nibbelke et al [1]. This is notably due to the difference in the noble metal used, and such phenomenon has been observed by other researchers [37][38][39], where it is reported that desorption of CO from Pd is slowly occurring around 480 K, while CO desorption from Pt readily occurs at much lower temperatures. This slow rate of CO desorption from the noble metal has an effect on the surface reaction between CO and oxygen on noble metal (step 4), since a lower rate coefficient is found for the present catalyst.…”
Section: Co Oxidation By O 2 In the Absence Of H 2 O And Cocontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The rate coefficient of CO desorption from the noble metal (backward reaction in step 1) is very low in the present study compared to the value reported by Nibbelke et al [1]. This is notably due to the difference in the noble metal used, and such phenomenon has been observed by other researchers [37][38][39], where it is reported that desorption of CO from Pd is slowly occurring around 480 K, while CO desorption from Pt readily occurs at much lower temperatures. This slow rate of CO desorption from the noble metal has an effect on the surface reaction between CO and oxygen on noble metal (step 4), since a lower rate coefficient is found for the present catalyst.…”
Section: Co Oxidation By O 2 In the Absence Of H 2 O And Cocontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Specific carbon atoms are denoted, where possible. is at about 490 K, consistent with CO production being desorption limited [19]. The relatively small saturation yield of CO (0.12 ML) suggests that only a relatively small coverage of GBL (maximum of 0.06 ML) undergoes complete decarbonylation.…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Desorptionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The relatively small saturation yield of CO (0.12 ML) suggests that only a relatively small coverage of GBL (maximum of 0.06 ML) undergoes complete decarbonylation. The hydrogen (m/e = 2) desorption trace contains a major peak with a maximum at about 350 K, which is consistent with H 2 also arising from a desorption-limited process [19,20]. There appears to be a shoulder and long trailing edge in the H 2 desorption trace, suggesting that some additional surface dehydrogenation reactions occur at higher temperature.…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Desorptionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…40 From a simple Langmuir argument a second-order adsorption is expected, but the observed adsorption data from studies on single-crystalline Pd surfaces indicate that the sticking coefficient is much less dependent on the hydrogen coverage. 41,42 The adsorption order on Pd films is not clear from the literature, but here we will show that a second-order adsorption, as used above, is appropriate. Figure 2 shows the HD desorption from a Pd surface at a certain pressure for temperatures in the range of 223-523 K. The surface is exposed to a mixture of H 2 and D 2 and HD is formed on the Pd surface after dissociation of the impinging molecules.…”
Section: B Experimental Evidence For Second-order Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The reason to include x = 0.5 is that it "simulates" the observed precursor adsorption observed on single-crystalline Pd. 41,42 We expect that the hydrogen coverages from the two types of experiments are equal ͑solid line͒ and observed that the best agreement is obtained for x = 2. The conclusion is therefore that the hydrogen sticking is of second order for hydrogen adsorption on the Pd surface ͑at least for s Ͻ 0.6͒.…”
Section: B Experimental Evidence For Second-order Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 98%