2002
DOI: 10.2307/1512183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption, Blood Kinship, Stigma, and the Adoption Reform Movement: A Historical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of adoptions from Latin American countries is also rapidly increasing (Kenney and Ortman, 2005). It also seems very plausible that agencies (or families) still steer adopting parents toward children of the same race when those options exist (Carp, 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of adoptions from Latin American countries is also rapidly increasing (Kenney and Ortman, 2005). It also seems very plausible that agencies (or families) still steer adopting parents toward children of the same race when those options exist (Carp, 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing literature on experiences of adult adoptees who search and find their birth families and seek a 'reunion' or ongoing relationship (Kim, 2010;van Wichelen, 2017;Yngvesson, 2003Yngvesson, , 2010. From the 1980s, adult adoptees in the US started organising themselves politically and, supported by birth mothers, initiated protests and legal actions to open sealed adoption records (Carp, 1998(Carp, , 2002Modell & Schachter, 2002). Recently, more and more adoptees have been turning to DNA testing companies to find out information about their birth parents and to learn about any genetic predispositions for particular diseases (Swarns, 2012).…”
Section: Connecting To Birth Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the government advisers suggested a meticolous surveillance against the alteration of birth information, since "every person has the right to know who he is and where his people are" (Carp, 1998, p.52). Therefore, the original aim was not to deny the access to the information to adoptees -for whom the information was only confidential and not secret -but to protect their biological mothers from the social stigma (Carp, 2002). The process by which the confidentiality turned into secrecy was quite complex, and it seems in some way connected with the spread and increased disciplinary power (in foucaultian sense) of social professions.…”
Section: Secrets Biographical Fractures and Right To Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%