2015
DOI: 10.1515/humaff-2015-0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adopting Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Constructing A Multilingual’S Identity

Abstract: The cultural phenomenon of globalization has led to bilingualism and/or multilingualism (at least from a socio-pragmatic point of view). This brought to the attention of professionals the issue of the transformation of an identity from monolingual to multilingual. Due to the individual and at the same time social nature of the setting in which a man interacts, the study of the issue of personal identity has to be crossdisciplinary. We claim that in the course of this transformation the language-culture-identit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are exceptions insofar as some researchers are not explicit about their theoretical stance at all and other scholars, including the most influential (for example, Norton), have drawn on both the sociocultural and poststructural at different times and for different purposes. In line with Block would argue that just as defining and researching identity crosses traditional boundaries between disciplines (Bilá, Kačmárová, & Vaňková, 2015;Holliday, Hyde, & Kullman, 2004), it similarly transcends the boundaries of a single theoretical perspective. This approach follows in the tradition of identity research described by Omoniyi (2006) as both 'multi-theoretical and multidisciplinary' (p. 14) and by Kostoulas and Mercer (2016) who argue that 'integrating differing perspectives is more likely to create a richer understanding of the self in the long run' (p. 130).…”
Section: A Multi-theoretical Approach To Investigating Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are exceptions insofar as some researchers are not explicit about their theoretical stance at all and other scholars, including the most influential (for example, Norton), have drawn on both the sociocultural and poststructural at different times and for different purposes. In line with Block would argue that just as defining and researching identity crosses traditional boundaries between disciplines (Bilá, Kačmárová, & Vaňková, 2015;Holliday, Hyde, & Kullman, 2004), it similarly transcends the boundaries of a single theoretical perspective. This approach follows in the tradition of identity research described by Omoniyi (2006) as both 'multi-theoretical and multidisciplinary' (p. 14) and by Kostoulas and Mercer (2016) who argue that 'integrating differing perspectives is more likely to create a richer understanding of the self in the long run' (p. 130).…”
Section: A Multi-theoretical Approach To Investigating Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have elaborated on our previous research based on socio-constructivist treatment of human identity, exploring it as a structure defined by using and experiencing language and producing discourses (Bilá, Kačmárová and Vaňková 2015). We view a translator as having a multilingual identity from a socio-pragmatic perspective, i.e.…”
Section: Suggesting the Components Of The Translating Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to V.E. Klochko, "the anthropologization of psychological knowledge is already seen as the tendency, but this tendency is not understood yet as expression of regularities that define self-movement of psychological knowledge as well as mechanisms that provide science self-development as progressive ("forward" and "upright") movements of a psychological thought" (Klochko, 2007;Bilá, Kačmárová, & Vaňková, 2015;Woźniak, 2015).…”
Section: State Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%