2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents At Risk for Alcohol Abuse Demonstrate Altered Frontal Lobe Activation During Stroop Performance

Abstract: Background Children and adolescents, family history positive (FH+) for alcoholism, exhibit differences in brain structure and functional activation when compared to family history negative (FH-) counterparts. Given that frontal brain regions, and associated reciprocal connections with limbic structures, undergo the most dramatic maturational changes during adolescence, the objective of this study was to compare functional brain activation during a frontally-mediated test of response inhibition in 32 adolescent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
6
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…reduced neuronal efficiency), as compared with patients without such a history and HCs. Reduced neuronal efficiency of frontal areas during cognitively challenging tasks was reported earlier in FH+ youth (Silveri et al 2011), heavy cannabis users (Kanayama et al 2004) and after sleep deprivation (Drummond et al 2001(Drummond et al , 2005. As the DLPFC and ACC are part of a network involved in top-down emotional regulation (Phillips et al 2003a ;Drevets et al 2008), impairments in these regions could lead to a decreased capacity for emotion regulation, further contributing to an unfavourable course of mood/anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…reduced neuronal efficiency), as compared with patients without such a history and HCs. Reduced neuronal efficiency of frontal areas during cognitively challenging tasks was reported earlier in FH+ youth (Silveri et al 2011), heavy cannabis users (Kanayama et al 2004) and after sleep deprivation (Drummond et al 2001(Drummond et al , 2005. As the DLPFC and ACC are part of a network involved in top-down emotional regulation (Phillips et al 2003a ;Drevets et al 2008), impairments in these regions could lead to a decreased capacity for emotion regulation, further contributing to an unfavourable course of mood/anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, there is a wide literature supporting the fact that dysfunctional cognitive control is both a potential risk factor for (Saunders et al, 2008; Silveri et al, 2011; Mackiewicz Seghete et al, 2013) or a potential consequence of (Pfefferbaum et al, 1998) AUD. In this article, exploring ‘which came first ’ and the relationships of family history of inhibitory control and genetics will not be a focus.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heitzeg et al (14) found abnormal caudate activation during response inhibition in 16-22 year-olds with a family history of AUD compared to controls, while Schweinsburg et al (15) observed a decrease in left middle frontal gyrus activity during response inhibition in 12-14 year-old family history positive youth. Silveri and colleagues (16) reported greater recruitment of frontal regions, including right middle frontal and cingulate gyri, in 8-19 year-olds with parental AUDs. Further studies have used follow-up data to retrospectively classify participants (who were not recruited based on family history) by whether they began using substances after fMRI scanning to provide a more definitive connection between neural activation patterns and risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%