2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70473-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
707
3
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 840 publications
(731 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
707
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical resection, either alone or in combination with perioperative chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, or chemoradiation is the main curative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (1)(2)(3). Malnutrition has been widely recognized in gastric cancer patients because of the disease itself or because of the surgical and oncological treatments (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection, either alone or in combination with perioperative chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, or chemoradiation is the main curative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (1)(2)(3). Malnutrition has been widely recognized in gastric cancer patients because of the disease itself or because of the surgical and oncological treatments (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in the XELOX arm had improved 3-year DFS (74% vs. 59%, P0.0001) and OS (83% vs. 78% P=0.0493) [21]. After 5 years follow up, the XELOX arm had significantly better 5-year DFS (68% vs. 53%, P<0.0001) and 5-year OS (78% vs. 69%, p=0.0029) [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The CLASSIC study was an open-label, parallel-group, multiregion (mainland China, Taiwan and South Korea), Phase III RCT that compared surgery with and without XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-IIIB GC patients who had undergone D2 dissection [8,11]. Analysis of the Chinese subgroup (n = 100) showed a significantly higher 3-year DFS rate (78 vs 56%, HR: 0.56; p < 0.0001) and a reduced risk of relapse (59% reduction, p = 0.013) in the surgery + XELOX group than in the surgery-only group; however, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was similar in the two arms (78 vs 66%; p = 0.110).…”
Section: Capecitabine-based Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the Chinese subgroup (n = 100) showed a significantly higher 3-year DFS rate (78 vs 56%, HR: 0.56; p < 0.0001) and a reduced risk of relapse (59% reduction, p = 0.013) in the surgery + XELOX group than in the surgery-only group; however, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was similar in the two arms (78 vs 66%; p = 0.110). Grade III or IV adverse events (AEs) in the surgery + XELOX group included neutropenia (63.5%), thrombocytopenia (36.5%), vomiting (44.2%), decreased appetite (34.6%) and loss of bodyweight (23.1%) [8]. Similar with results were recorded in the overall population of the CLASSIC study, indicating that adjuvant XELOX chemotherapy improved outcomes in patients with AGC after D2 gastrectomy and had an acceptable safety profile [8].…”
Section: Capecitabine-based Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%