2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11470-0_4
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: We discuss the application of the adiabatic perturbation theory to analyze the dynamics in various systems in the limit of slow parametric changes of the Hamiltonian. We first consider a two-level system and give an elementary derivation of the asymptotics of the transition probability when the tuning parameter slowly changes in the finite range. Then we apply this perturbation theory to many-particle systems with low energy spectrum characterized by quasiparticle excitations. Within this approach we derive th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(152 reference statements)
6
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction was recently confirmed in cold-atom experiments with accelerated optical lattices (Zenesini, Lignier, Tayebirad et al, 2009). An analogous mechanism also explains the amount of energy injected into a system upon crossing a quantum-critical point or parameter changes in a gapless phase (Dziarmaga, 2010), as obtained from adiabatic perturbation theory (Grandi and Polkovnikov, 2010). In these cases the excitation energy typically behaves as ΔEðτÞ ∼ τ −η for large ramp times τ → ∞, with the positive exponent η depending on the details of the system and the ramp protocol.…”
Section: A Excitation Energy After a Continuous Parameter Changementioning
confidence: 93%
“…This prediction was recently confirmed in cold-atom experiments with accelerated optical lattices (Zenesini, Lignier, Tayebirad et al, 2009). An analogous mechanism also explains the amount of energy injected into a system upon crossing a quantum-critical point or parameter changes in a gapless phase (Dziarmaga, 2010), as obtained from adiabatic perturbation theory (Grandi and Polkovnikov, 2010). In these cases the excitation energy typically behaves as ΔEðτÞ ∼ τ −η for large ramp times τ → ∞, with the positive exponent η depending on the details of the system and the ramp protocol.…”
Section: A Excitation Energy After a Continuous Parameter Changementioning
confidence: 93%
“…As shown in Refs. [26,37], this response is closely related to the geometrical properties of the ground state via 1 2 sin…”
Section: A Sweep Protocol and Dynamical Chern Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantities considered so far could have in principle been obtained by using adiabatic perturbation theory [31], since our perturbative results capture only the lowest order correction in J z /J to the above physical quantities. Therefore, we now focus on the spin flip correlation function S + S − , which contains the bosonic fields in the exponent and demonstrates the non-perturbative nature of bosonization: the present approach yields to first correction in J z to the exponent of the spin-flip correlation function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%