Adhesive failure analysis of pressure-sensitive adhesives

Abstract

In this article we use a linear elastic fracture mechanics approach to characterize the adhesive performance of two commercially available pressure‐sensitive adhesives (PSAs). An axisymmetric adhesion test involving the contact of a spherical indenter with a thin adhesive layer is used to generate “tack” curves for both adhesives. These curves describe the relationship between the normal loads and displacements during the test. Adhesive failure is understood in terms of crack propagation at the indenter/adhesive interface. We investigate the effects of adhesive layer thickness and crosshead velocity on the tack curves. Using fracture mechanics equations developed for thin layers, we show that the energy release rate is a unique function of the crack velocity for a given adhesive. Based on the tack curves and energy release rates, we discuss the coupling of the bulk and interfacial properties that produce the large adhesion energies typical of pressure‐sensitive adhesives. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 3455–3472, 1999

Deformation behavior of thin, compliant layers under tensile loading conditions

“…Figures 12 and 13 illustrate the situation for p 0 / E < 1. For intermediate values of a 0 / h 0 , interfacial fingering is observed, as illustrated in Figure 12 64. For large values of a 0 / h 0 , bulk cavitation is observed, as shown in Figure 13 20.…”

Directional Adhesion of Monodomain Liquid Crystalline Elastomers

“…The LCEs were placed on a stiff backing layer to negate significant tensile deformation of the tape arm (see Table S5). − A primed-PET backing of 50 μm thickness was applied with a heat press onto the LCE, bonding the two materials together (Figure a). Samples were cut into rectangles with the nematic director either parallel or orthogonal to the long (peel) direction of the strip.…”

Strong, Reversible, Heat‐Activated Adhesion from Liquid Crystal Polymer Networks

“…The adhesive failure mode in this region resembles that of traditional structural adhesives. [44][45][46] In practice, we observed extremely high variance on the testing results at such low temperatures since the generation of cracks depends on the random presence of defects (impurities, air bubbles, external noises, etc.) At temperatures just below Tg, the material still retains some of the elastomeric softness while having a much higher modulus, thus consistently lead to a peak in the adhesion force.…”