2004
DOI: 10.1179/000349804225021271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to a combination of artemether and lumefantrine (Coartem®) in Kajo Keji, southern Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10] Focusing on studies that used a related study design, our results (23% certainly non-adherent) were comparable with two studies in South Sudan (18% certainly non-adherent) 20 and Zambia (21%). 13 Both settings were similar to this study: a remote rural area; low patient educational level; treatment intake over 3 days; and this specific treatment already implemented for some time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9][10] Focusing on studies that used a related study design, our results (23% certainly non-adherent) were comparable with two studies in South Sudan (18% certainly non-adherent) 20 and Zambia (21%). 13 Both settings were similar to this study: a remote rural area; low patient educational level; treatment intake over 3 days; and this specific treatment already implemented for some time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this study, definitions that had already proven their reliability in two similar settings were used. 13,20 Patients were classified according to following three adherence categories: (i) certain non-adherence: patients who had any AS and/or AQ tablets remaining in the coblister package at the time of the home visit; (ii) probable non-adherence: patients with a verbal account that not all the tablets were taken but no AS+AQ co-blister package could be shown or it was empty, and/or patients with a verbal account that AS+AQ was not taken according to the prescribed time schedule or in the prescribed dosage of the treatment protocol but no AS+AQ co-blister package could be shown or it was empty; and (iii) probable adherence: patients with a verbal account of complete treatment exactly following the treatment protocol but no AS+AQ coblister package could be shown or it was empty. Table 1 shows the final classification scheme of study patients according to the treatment intake and the presence of the AS+AQ co-blister package.…”
Section: Definition Of Adherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous studies [15][16][17] based on home visits at day 3 and questionnaires addressed to the parents, compliance with treatment was classified into four categories: 1) certain compliance for patients for whom complete treatment was reported, with the treatment protocol followed exactly, supported by the evidence of an empty blister pack for the drug; 2) probable compliance for patients for whom complete treatment was reported with the treatment protocol followed exactly but without the supporting evidence of the empty blister pack; 3) probable non-compliance in cases in which all tablets were reported to have been taken, but not consistent with the prescribed time/ dosage schedule; and 4) certain non-compliance for patients for whom tablets remained in the blister pack at the time of the home visit. Compliance was assessed by the MO on day 3.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In some countries where studies have been done, adherence to anti-malaria medications have been reported to be poor. [17][18][19][20] According to McDonnel et al, little attention is paid to the appropriate dosage and completion of the prescribed doses. 21 A number of studies have linked poor or nonadherence to the increased malaria related morbidity and mortality, therapeutic failure, drug resistance and missuse of the left-over drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%