2015
DOI: 10.1890/15-0926.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing potential local adaptation in species distribution models: implications for conservation under climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that populations of many temperate and boreal tree species are locally adapted to climate (Savolainen et al 2007;Alberto et al 2013;Aitken & Bemmels 2016), local adaptation has been hypothesized to have been an important factor affecting Pleistocene range shifts in trees (Davis & Shaw 2001), and is often considered to be a key factor that will determine the effects of future climate change on the potential geographic distributions of tree populations (e.g. Pearman et al 2010;Benito Garz on et al 2011;Gray & Hamann 2013;Valladares et al 2014;Gotelli & Stanton-Geddes 2015;H€ allfors et al 2016) and of adaptive genomic variation (Fitzpatrick & Keller 2015). In some cases, local adaptation may also leave a signature in patterns of neutral genetic variation (through its mediating effects on patterns of gene flow; e.g.…”
Section: Lack Of Support For Competing Explanations For Genetic Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that populations of many temperate and boreal tree species are locally adapted to climate (Savolainen et al 2007;Alberto et al 2013;Aitken & Bemmels 2016), local adaptation has been hypothesized to have been an important factor affecting Pleistocene range shifts in trees (Davis & Shaw 2001), and is often considered to be a key factor that will determine the effects of future climate change on the potential geographic distributions of tree populations (e.g. Pearman et al 2010;Benito Garz on et al 2011;Gray & Hamann 2013;Valladares et al 2014;Gotelli & Stanton-Geddes 2015;H€ allfors et al 2016) and of adaptive genomic variation (Fitzpatrick & Keller 2015). In some cases, local adaptation may also leave a signature in patterns of neutral genetic variation (through its mediating effects on patterns of gene flow; e.g.…”
Section: Lack Of Support For Competing Explanations For Genetic Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the geographic variation in functional traits in many tree species, it is also possible that geographic range shifts in response to climate change will depend strongly on individual responses of specific populations to unique environmental factors (e.g. Davis & Shaw 2001;Pearman et al 2010;Benito Garz on et al 2011;Valladares et al 2014;Gotelli & Stanton-Geddes 2015;H€ allfors et al 2016). Lastly, the response to past climate change might simply reflect shifts in habitat suitability as it relates to basic climate variables, without the need to invoke complex, species-specific nuances of niche or mechanistic trade-offs in functional traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple factors, including current genetic and ecological diversity within species, influence whether climate change will have beneficial or detrimental consequences on species ranges and persistence (Hoffmann and Sgrò 2011, Moritz and Agudo 2013, Urban 2015. Moreover, spatial variation in genetic and ecological diversity differentially affects locally adapted populations within species, but such variation has been incorporated in future predictions only recently (Fitzpatrick and Keller 2015, Gotelli and Stanton-Geddes 2015, Moran et al 2015, Hällfors et al 2016, Ikeda et al 2017. Therefore, assessing the role of intraspecific biological diversity on species persistence under rapid climate change represents a central goal in biodiversity research and conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has implications for comparative studies, because for each species, the realised niche quantified from distribution data will be a more or less accurate representation of the fundamental niche. However, recent advances in modelling species distributions have begun to address this problem by incorporating factors such as dispersal (Génard and Lescourret 2013), biotic interactions (Kissling et al 2010, Wisz et al 2013, adaptation (Hällfors et al 2015), population dynamics (Heinrichs et al 2010), and multiple drivers and their interactions (Hof et al 2011).…”
Section: Quantification Of Climatic Niches In Birds: Adding the Tempomentioning
confidence: 99%