2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive manufactured porous titanium structures: Through-process quantification of pore and strut networks

Abstract: 14.10.14 KB. Ok to add published version to spiral, OA paper under cc licens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The voxel size of the reconstructed volumes was 7.85 mm. The 3D volumes were then processed following the procedure of Yue et al [25][26] so that porosity (both bulk and internal) and strut size distribution could be quantified. The strut diameter is expressed as that of the largest sphere that can be inscribed in the struts.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterisation and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voxel size of the reconstructed volumes was 7.85 mm. The 3D volumes were then processed following the procedure of Yue et al [25][26] so that porosity (both bulk and internal) and strut size distribution could be quantified. The strut diameter is expressed as that of the largest sphere that can be inscribed in the struts.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterisation and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of porous Ti can be designed and optimized according to the clinical requirements. The capacity of AM technology for fabricating porous Ti scaffolds with tailored mechanical properties has been demonstrated extensively [25][26][27].…”
Section: Characterization Of Composite Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random porous and cellular materials represent a category of complicated structures where novel SPC methods are needed to cope with the challenging nature of quality inspection data (Kim et al, 2014;Zhuravleva et al, 2013;Campoli et al, 2013;Banhart, 2001). In this framework, practitioners need effective methods to describe, in a synthetic way, the quality signatures enclosed in cross-section images.…”
Section: A Motivating Real Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%