2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Randomized, Comparative Study

Abstract: Background and aim: There is an unmet need to prolong analgesia duration following regional anesthesia; dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for the intrathecal block has gained popularity over the last few years. The present study compares the onset, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effect of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine administered intrathecally.Methods: With approvals, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Also, Kalbande et al found that falls in HR, SBP, and DBP were higher and steeper in the group who received fentanyl 25 µg than those who received DEX 5 µg and were statistically significant. 13 According to block characteristics, our results showed that there was no statistical significance between both groups as regards the highest sensory level, the time taken to reach Bromage III in the side blocked and the time taken to reach the highest sensory level. But time to two-segment regression, time for sensory regression to S1 and time to regression to Bromage 0 in the side blocked, were longer in Group D than Group F, and these differences were highly significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…6 Also, Kalbande et al found that falls in HR, SBP, and DBP were higher and steeper in the group who received fentanyl 25 µg than those who received DEX 5 µg and were statistically significant. 13 According to block characteristics, our results showed that there was no statistical significance between both groups as regards the highest sensory level, the time taken to reach Bromage III in the side blocked and the time taken to reach the highest sensory level. But time to two-segment regression, time for sensory regression to S1 and time to regression to Bromage 0 in the side blocked, were longer in Group D than Group F, and these differences were highly significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%