2022
DOI: 10.1049/cje.2020.00.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Simplified Chicken Swarm Optimization Based on Inverted S‐Shaped Inertia Weight

Abstract: Considering the issues of premature convergence and low solution accuracy in solving high-dimensional problems with the basic chicken swarm optimization algorithm, an adaptive simplified chicken swarm optimization algorithm based on inverted S-shaped inertia weight (ASCSO-S) is proposed. Firstly, a simplified chicken swarm optimization algorithm is presented by removing all the chicks from the chicken swarm. Secondly, an inverted S-shaped inertia weight is designed and introduced into the updating process of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the progress of the research on metaheuristic techniques, the inertia weight has been introduced into many swarm intelligence-based approaches to improve their performance. For example, GU et al (2022) implemented the inertia weight to tune the particle’s search behavior in chicken swarm algorithm (CSA) (Meng et al, et al). Jena et al ( Jena and Satapathy, 2021 ) used a Sigmoid adaptive inertia weight to intensify the performance of the social group optimization (SGO) ( Naik et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Essentials Of the Oplssamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the progress of the research on metaheuristic techniques, the inertia weight has been introduced into many swarm intelligence-based approaches to improve their performance. For example, GU et al (2022) implemented the inertia weight to tune the particle’s search behavior in chicken swarm algorithm (CSA) (Meng et al, et al). Jena et al ( Jena and Satapathy, 2021 ) used a Sigmoid adaptive inertia weight to intensify the performance of the social group optimization (SGO) ( Naik et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Essentials Of the Oplssamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the reason why N re and N ed are set to 10 in BFA is to ensure that the maximum number of iterations is 10000. The parameter settings of PSO and GA are derived from the comparison algorithms mentioned in the literature [ 28 , 32 ], respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of various algorithms more reasonably, this section uses the Friedman test to test the performance of the abovementioned 7 algorithms (ICSO, ICSOII, PSO, CSO, GA, BFA, and AFSA) from a statistical point of view. The Friedman test is a nonparametric test method, which is often used to test the performance of algorithms due to its simple operation and lax requirements on the test data [ 32 , 33 , 36 ]. For the minimum optimization problem, the smaller the average ranking of the algorithm, the better its performance.…”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the convergence speed and stability were improved, the solution accuracy is still unsatisfactory. Gu et al realized the solution to high-dimensional complex function optimization problems by removing the chicks in the chicken swarm and introducing an inverted S-shaped inertial weight to construct an adaptive simplified CSO algorithm [ 28 ]. Although the proposed algorithm is significantly better than some other algorithms in solution accuracy, there is still room for improvement in convergence speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%