1980
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Multivariate Ridge Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By assuming that variables are normally distributed, we have shown that BNs are in fact equivalent to multivariate GBLUP and, by extension, to single-trait GBLUP. Furthermore, the separation between structure and parameter learning makes it possible to accommodate different parametric assumptions with relatively few changes and subsume models such as univariate and multivariate ridge-regression (Hoerl and Kennard 1970;Brown and Zidek 1980). As far as inference is concerned, several established methods from the literature can be used to predict traits from SNPs and vice versa; two examples are logic sampling and likelihood weighting (Koller and Friedman 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By assuming that variables are normally distributed, we have shown that BNs are in fact equivalent to multivariate GBLUP and, by extension, to single-trait GBLUP. Furthermore, the separation between structure and parameter learning makes it possible to accommodate different parametric assumptions with relatively few changes and subsume models such as univariate and multivariate ridge-regression (Hoerl and Kennard 1970;Brown and Zidek 1980). As far as inference is concerned, several established methods from the literature can be used to predict traits from SNPs and vice versa; two examples are logic sampling and likelihood weighting (Koller and Friedman 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, penalized estimators such as ridge regression (RR; Hoerl and Kennard 1970) can be used when G is dense. The resulting BN can then be considered a flexible implementation of multivariate ridge regression, which has a number of of desirable properties over OLS (Brown and Zidek 1980). Equivalently, we can describe a BN using its global distribution, denoted with P(X) in (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown and Zidek (1980) consider multivariate regression, although with 7 known, so that ; | ;tN(;, I) instead of (2.8). Assuming ;tN(0, I q 1 p_p ) for 1 partially known, they derive minimaxity results generalizing those of Thisted (1976) when the unknown hyperparameters in 1 are appropriately estimated from the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that if we replace Θ with I n , which may be thought of as a degenerate case of restriction to the span of a basis, then (9) becomes a special case of the (n-dimensional) multivariate ridge regression estimate of Brown and Zidek (1980).…”
Section: Responses In Raw Form: the General Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whereas the latter submatrices have n rows, the former have K-expressing the assumption that, even if the functional response data consist of a large number n of points, these contain no more than K "pieces of information" given by K basis coefficients. When J θθ = I K , (13) reduces again to the multivariate ridge regression estimate of Brown and Zidek (1980), but in this case the multivariate response is the basis coefficient vector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%