2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-987x(20001130)21:15<1319::aid-jcc1>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation I. Algorithms and examples

Abstract: On page 1332 of the above article the statement "For example, in DelPhi, one may only employ cubical meshes with 63 mesh lines in each direction" is no longer accurate; more recent versions of DelPhi have been extended to allow for the use of larger cubical meshes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
267
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
267
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common numerical techniques for solving the PB equation are based on discretization of the domain of interest into small regions. Those methods include finite difference (Davis and McCammon, 1989;Nicholls and Honig, 1991;Holst and Saied, 1993;Holst and Saied, 1995;Baker et al, 2001), finite element Friesner, 1997a, 1997b;Baker et al, 2000;Holst et al, 2000;Baker et al, 2001;Dyshlovenko, 2002), and boundary element methods (Zauhar and Morgan, 1988;Juffer et al, 1991;Allison and Huber, 1995;Bordner and Huber, 2003;Boschitsch and Fenley, 2004), all of which continue to be developed to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of electrostatics calculations in the numerous biomolecular applications described below. The major software packages that can be used to solve the PB equation are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Iiic Poisson-boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common numerical techniques for solving the PB equation are based on discretization of the domain of interest into small regions. Those methods include finite difference (Davis and McCammon, 1989;Nicholls and Honig, 1991;Holst and Saied, 1993;Holst and Saied, 1995;Baker et al, 2001), finite element Friesner, 1997a, 1997b;Baker et al, 2000;Holst et al, 2000;Baker et al, 2001;Dyshlovenko, 2002), and boundary element methods (Zauhar and Morgan, 1988;Juffer et al, 1991;Allison and Huber, 1995;Bordner and Huber, 2003;Boschitsch and Fenley, 2004), all of which continue to be developed to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of electrostatics calculations in the numerous biomolecular applications described below. The major software packages that can be used to solve the PB equation are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Iiic Poisson-boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results establish a clear framework for future investigations aimed at defining the structure-function mechanisms that mediate the regulation of CLH-3b and other CLC proteins. (48). PQR files were generated using the PDB2PQR program (49).…”
Section: Function Of Clc Cbs and Bateman Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [9] maintained an approximating triangulation of a deforming skin surface. Simplex subdivision schemes are used to generate tetrahedral meshes for molecular structures in solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation [22]. Gaussian functions have been used to construct density maps [5] [21] [33] [1] [31], from which implicit solvation models are approximated as an isocontour [21] [27] [18].…”
Section: Molecular Surface Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As used for Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations in [22], a characteristic function f (x) is selected to represent an 'inflated' van der Waals-based accessibility (1) where (x i , r i ) are the centers and radii of the N atoms in the biomolecule, and σ is the radius of the diffusing species, here we choose σ = 2 [43]. When σ = 0, the VWS is constructed.…”
Section: Gaussian Density Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%