2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting forest management to climate change: The state of science and applications in Canada and the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach to increasing adaptive capacity is to use existing vulnerability assessments (e.g., forest vulnerability assessments), where various stakeholders (including Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, firms, and others) identify risks to resources, the values derived from these resources, and potential adaptation options to mitigate negative impacts. In North America, forest vulnerability assessments are part of a broader suite of climate change assessments that have been carried out in the past decade (Halofsky et al 2018). A synthesis of a dozen early attempts at forest vulnerability assessments distributed across Canada found that where collaborative processes were used in these assessments they were important in building local understanding and increasing local adaptive capacity, which are important determinants in identifying options and motivating action (Johnston and Edwards 2013).…”
Section: Policy Recommendation 3: Create and Implement Programs And Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One approach to increasing adaptive capacity is to use existing vulnerability assessments (e.g., forest vulnerability assessments), where various stakeholders (including Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, firms, and others) identify risks to resources, the values derived from these resources, and potential adaptation options to mitigate negative impacts. In North America, forest vulnerability assessments are part of a broader suite of climate change assessments that have been carried out in the past decade (Halofsky et al 2018). A synthesis of a dozen early attempts at forest vulnerability assessments distributed across Canada found that where collaborative processes were used in these assessments they were important in building local understanding and increasing local adaptive capacity, which are important determinants in identifying options and motivating action (Johnston and Edwards 2013).…”
Section: Policy Recommendation 3: Create and Implement Programs And Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A synthesis of a dozen early attempts at forest vulnerability assessments distributed across Canada found that where collaborative processes were used in these assessments they were important in building local understanding and increasing local adaptive capacity, which are important determinants in identifying options and motivating action (Johnston and Edwards 2013). Halofsky et al (2018) examined the use of these assessments across the United States and Canada; they found that while these vulnerability assessments and development of adaptation planning and strategies were growing in terms of organizational changes and awareness, and on-the-ground examples continue to proliferate, to be effective the goal should be to incorporate vulnerability assessments into business-as-usual decisionmaking (i.e., mainstreaming) so that climate change becomes a part of sustainable resource management. In the boreal zone, support for these kinds of assessments could provide not only a structured way to tackle the need to develop increased adaptive capacity but can also offer a way to connect and tie together policy development at different levels.…”
Section: Policy Recommendation 3: Create and Implement Programs And Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broad-scale monitoring of aquatic systems in combination with climate change vulnerability assessments should help prioritize the type and location of future forest management activities (Halofsky et al 2018) in a manner that fosters the protection of aquatic biodiversity. This rule not only requires monitoring to inform decisions at the forest scale but also at broader scales.…”
Section: Developments In Forest Service Aquatic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement will foster monitoring stream and watershed conditions at a national scale through tools such as Watershed Condition Framework. Broad-scale monitoring of aquatic systems in combination with climate change vulnerability assessments should help prioritize the type and location of future forest management activities (Halofsky et al 2018) in a manner that fosters the protection of aquatic biodiversity.…”
Section: Developments In Forest Service Aquatic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating vulnerability and uncertainty is part of an overall adaptation framework that also includes characterizing change and elucidating strategy and then responding to assessment results through management and monitoring (Halofsky et al. ). Accordingly, it is necessary to understand vulnerability patterns at subregional scales that are relevant to land managers (e.g., watersheds to subbasins; Peterson et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%