2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40663-016-0082-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of forest management to climate change as perceived by forest owners and managers in Belgium

Abstract: Background: Climate change is likely to cause significant modifications in forests. Rising to this challenge may require adaptation of forest management, and therefore should trigger proactive measures by forest managers, but it is unclear to what extent this is already happening. Methods: The survey carried out in this research assesses how forest stakeholders in Belgium perceive the role of their forest management in the context of climate change and the impediments that limit their ability to prepare and re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer is probably linked to the forest owner's risk perception. Indeed, to implement adaptation strategies, forest owners have to be convinced that climate change may be a threat to their forests (Sousa-Silva et al 2016). Some papers highlight the fact that forest owners' risk perception is a major issue when dealing with adaptation strategies (Blennow and Persson 2009;Blennow et al 2012;Yousefpour and Hanewinkel 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The answer is probably linked to the forest owner's risk perception. Indeed, to implement adaptation strategies, forest owners have to be convinced that climate change may be a threat to their forests (Sousa-Silva et al 2016). Some papers highlight the fact that forest owners' risk perception is a major issue when dealing with adaptation strategies (Blennow and Persson 2009;Blennow et al 2012;Yousefpour and Hanewinkel 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and nothing seems to be decided. Indeed, following Brukas et al (2001) the usual range for forestry project is [2%, 4%], following Calvet et al (1997) it may be higher for short rotation period, and it should be 4% following Snowdon and Harou (2014). After discussion with the forestry experts, we assume a 2% discount rate, and to analyze the robustness of our results to the variation of this parameter, we perform a sensitivity analysis (see Sect.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nyilván ez az eredmény meglehetősen ország-specifikus, más helyszíneken eltérő eredmények adódtak (vö. Furness & Nelson 2012;Detten & Faber 2013;Sousa-Silva et al 2016) A módszertanban jelzett háromféle erdő-csoportosításban a válaszadók átlagos klíma-romlás-indexét a 2. ábra mutatja. Ez jelzi már azt, hogy a legnagyobb különbségek a regionális és az erdőtípus szerinti bontásban mutatkoztak, ezeket érdemes hát közelebbről is megvizsgálni, amikor az érzékelés és a hely kapcsolatát vizsgáljuk, hiszen a domborzati típusok kapcsán a hegyvidékekre és a síkvidé-kekre is számos esetben igaz, hogy valamelyest kisebb mértékben tapasztalják a problémá-kat.…”
Section: Az éGhajlatváltozás éRzékeléseunclassified
“…Despite overwhelming evidence about climate change impacts on natural and human systems (Cramer et al 2014), uncertainty about impacts is often perceived as one of the main challenges for taking action on climate change (Moser and Ekstrom 2010, Hanger et al 2013, Yousefpour and Hanewinkel 2016. In forest management, a key problem is that actions to maintain ecosystem functions under a changing climate need to be taken several decades earlier than their expected effect (Spittlehouse andStewart 2003, Millar et al 2007). Yet, uncertainties related to future forest growth, the occurrence of disturbances, and mortality complicate taking decisions about the most suitable adaption and mitigation measures to implement (O'Hara and Ramage 2013, Petr et al 2016, Seidl et al 2017, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%