2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of building envelope models for energy simulation at district scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is currently no consensus on the approach to be used. (Frayssinet et al, 2017) shows that more detail envelope meshing than usual simplified BEM is needed when studying power demand. (Perez et al, 2015) presents the R7C4 monozone model developed to consider the major phenomena in the DIMOSIM simulation platform.…”
Section: 3384/ecp19157129mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently no consensus on the approach to be used. (Frayssinet et al, 2017) shows that more detail envelope meshing than usual simplified BEM is needed when studying power demand. (Perez et al, 2015) presents the R7C4 monozone model developed to consider the major phenomena in the DIMOSIM simulation platform.…”
Section: 3384/ecp19157129mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the district scale becomes more and more widespread in the energetic dynamic simulation software, like DIstrict MOdeller and SIMulator (DIMOSIM) developed by CSTB [26], City Energy Analyst (CEA) developed by ETH Zurich [27] or Tool for Energy Analysis and Simulation for Efficient Retrofit (TEASER) developed by RWTH Aachen [28]. It was observed that this scale change could be impractical by being relevant to annual heating needs, but not anymore when focusing on power analysis [29]. For this reason, models with different levels of detail have been studied.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the district scale becomes more and more widespread into the energetic dynamic simulation softwares, as DIMOSIM (DIstrict MOdeller and SIMulator) developed by the CSTB [15], CEA (City Energy Analyst) from the Zurich ETH [16] or TEASER (Tool for Energy Analysis and Simulation for Efficient Retrofit) from RWTH [17]. However, it was shown that this scale change could be dangerous by being relevant for annual heating needs, but not anymore when focusing on power analysis [18]. For this reason, we decided to base our study on models with different levels of details.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%