2019
DOI: 10.26707/1984-7270/2019v20n1p79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptação do Inventário de Sentido do Trabalho (WAMI) para o contexto brasileiro

Abstract: ResumoO estudo objetivou adaptar e reunir evidências iniciais de validade do Inventário de Sentido do Trabalho (WAMI) para o contexto brasileiro. Participaram 667 profissionais (74% mulheres, idade média M = 35,74). Os resultados indicaram que a versão brasileira do inventário apresentou melhores índices de ajuste na estrutura unifatorial (TLI = 0,99; RMSEA = 0,08) do que o instrumento original. As cargas fatoriais variaram de 0,65 a 0,95 (VME = 0,70). Além disso, os escores latentes do sentido do trabalho apr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the Brazilian study of WAMI found evidence of validity and reliability of the scale, the results also indicated that biases due to the method (e.g., acquiescence) could distort the representativeness and precision of the instrument to investigate meaningful work (Leonardo et al, 2019). The use of forced-choice items may shed light on the degree to which acquiescence due to homogeneous response biases influences measurement of meaningful work by the WAMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the Brazilian study of WAMI found evidence of validity and reliability of the scale, the results also indicated that biases due to the method (e.g., acquiescence) could distort the representativeness and precision of the instrument to investigate meaningful work (Leonardo et al, 2019). The use of forced-choice items may shed light on the degree to which acquiescence due to homogeneous response biases influences measurement of meaningful work by the WAMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Earlier research sought to validate the WAMI in a Brazilian sample of 667 professionals (74 % women, mean age 35.7, SD = 10.5). The results indicated that the Brazilian version of the inventory, unlike the original version which proposed three facotrs, presented better fit indices in the unifactorial structure (χ²(28) = 144.76; CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA (CI 90%) = .08 (.07 -.09), [internal consistency index of .94] (Leonardo et al, 2019). The factorial loads varied from .65 to .95 (VME = .70).…”
Section: Work and Meaning Inventory (Wami)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O sentido do trabalho foi avaliado pela Escala de Sentido no Trabalho (Steger et al, 2012). A versão brasileira (Leonardo, Pereira, Damásio, & Valentini, 2019) é composta por dez itens em uma única dimensão, respondidos em uma escala tipo Likert de seis pontos:…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…O índice de consistência interna do presente estudo foi de 0,743. Damásio (2019). A versão adaptada consta de 10 itens a serem respondidos em escala tipo Likert de cinco pontos, variando de 1 -Totalmente falso a 5 -Totalmente verdadeira.…”
Section: Escala De Autoeficácia Ocupacional (Eao-vr)unclassified