2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12012-019-09516-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Inhalation on the Vasculature and the Conducting Airways

Abstract: The use of electronic cigarettes has increased exponentially since its introduction onto the global market in 2006. However, short- and long-term health effects remain largely unknown due to the novelty of this product. The present study examines the acute effects of e-cigarette aerosol inhalation, with and without nicotine, on vascular and pulmonary function in healthy volunteers. Seventeen healthy subjects inhaled electronic cigarette aerosol with and without nicotine on two separate occasions in a double-bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
4
70
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical dashed line represents no effect, and plots to the right of the vertical dashed line indicate that the effect of ECN is greater than that of EC0. The results of most [8,16,34] but not all [2,9] of these acute vaping studies were consistent with the notion that nicotine-and not the non-nicotine constituents-in the EC aerosol was responsible for the acute sympathomimetic effects of EC vaping. The overall mean differences between the ECN and EC0 studies across all studies was 3.73 mmHg (95% CI 0.59-6.87; p = 0.02) for for SBP, 3.25 mmHg (95% CI 1.21-5.30; p = 0.0018) for DBP and 6.44 bpm (95% CI The forest plot of each study represents the mean differences between TCs and ECs, with the corresponding lower and upper 95% confidence bounds.…”
Section: Acute Autonomic Cardiovascular Effects Of Ecn Versus Ec0 Vapingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The vertical dashed line represents no effect, and plots to the right of the vertical dashed line indicate that the effect of ECN is greater than that of EC0. The results of most [8,16,34] but not all [2,9] of these acute vaping studies were consistent with the notion that nicotine-and not the non-nicotine constituents-in the EC aerosol was responsible for the acute sympathomimetic effects of EC vaping. The overall mean differences between the ECN and EC0 studies across all studies was 3.73 mmHg (95% CI 0.59-6.87; p = 0.02) for for SBP, 3.25 mmHg (95% CI 1.21-5.30; p = 0.0018) for DBP and 6.44 bpm (95% CI The forest plot of each study represents the mean differences between TCs and ECs, with the corresponding lower and upper 95% confidence bounds.…”
Section: Acute Autonomic Cardiovascular Effects Of Ecn Versus Ec0 Vapingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…E-cigarette usage has been linked to various acute adverse physiological changes in humans. These include increased airway inflammation, increased airway obstruction as well as increased levels of endothelial progenitor cells (indicative of vascular changes) and arterial stiffness (an important independent risk factor for future cardiovascular disease) [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endothelial cell (EC) derived EVs are considered an emerging biomarker for endothelial dysfunction and are pivotal in vascular injury and angiogenesis as well as thrombosis [17]. Increased levels of EC derived EVs are not only associated with endothelial dysfunction, but also increased arterial stiffness as well as a variety of vascular diseases including acute coronary syndrome and severe hypertension with end organ damage [9,17]. Moreover, long term conventional cigarette smoking has been linked to increased levels of EC derived EVs and the elevated levels are indicative of early lung destruction in otherwise healthy cigarette smokers [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Similarly, acute vaping of propylene glycol/ glycerol aerosol at high wattage with or without nicotine induced significant injury to airway epithelium and impaired pulmonary gas exchange. 55 Electronic cigarettes also induce an ion channel dysfunction in airway epithelial cells, and this was partially explained by the increased acrolein production, thus associating electronic cigarette use with chronic bronchitis onset and progression, as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. 56 Additionally, electronic cigarettes induced a greater efflux of inflammatory mediators from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lung cells, implicating that the use of electronic cigarettes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease might be associated with a worse clinical picture and exacerbations.…”
Section: Potential Health Harms Of Electronic Cigarettes Unrelated Tomentioning
confidence: 99%