2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2016.1304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actuator fault diagnosis of singular delayed LPV systems with inexact measured parameters via PI unknown input observer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, other works have considered the case in which the scheduling variables are measured inexactly, see for example, Refs. [128,161,162]. Further improvements have been provided by Ref.…”
Section: Unknown Input Observers-based Fault Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, other works have considered the case in which the scheduling variables are measured inexactly, see for example, Refs. [128,161,162]. Further improvements have been provided by Ref.…”
Section: Unknown Input Observers-based Fault Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrices Υ, S 1 and Σ can be achieved by solving the optimisation problem (36). The observer gain matrices S, T 2 and G can be calculated from (35), (30) and (22), respectively. Finally, the matrices H and L are deduced from (24) and (25).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the proposed methods in [16][17][18] are not suitable for systems with unknown inputs appearing in the output equation, since the observer gain matrices amplify the measurement output disturbance unavoidably. There are only a few results on simultaneous state and fault estimation in singular systems which are used in fault diagnosis [19][20][21][22][23]. In [19] it is assumed that sth derivative of the fault is bounded and to simultaneously estimate the singular system state and the fault, an unknown input Luenberger observer is augmented with integral actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first solution is to consider the estimation error dynamics and the original system in an uncertain system structure. The uncertainty describes the mismatch between either scheduling variable measurement or estimated scheduling variables with the real values as in other works . Then, the observer design needs to guarantee robust convergence against those uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty describes the mismatch between either scheduling variable measurement or estimated scheduling variables with the real values as in other works. 15,28,[30][31][32][33][34] Then, the observer design needs to guarantee robust convergence against those uncertainties. Other solutions are established by Heemels et al, 35 Maalej et al, 36 and Millerioux et al 37 based on the input-to-state stability property, designing LPV observers through bounded estimation error convergence, instead of asymptotic convergence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%