2017
DOI: 10.1080/0309877x.2017.1357073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active teaching to manage course difficulty and learning motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the third question (Q3), we expect, based on previous findings (Barba et al, 2016;Burns et al, 2020;Hidi, 1990;Niemivirta & Tapola, 2007;Nuutila et al, 2020;Richardson et al, 2012;Rotgans & Schmidt, 2018;Schöber et al, 2018;Talsma et al, 2018;Vainikainen et al, 2015), the initial levels of situational interest and self-efficacy to be predictive of task performance. Similarly, in line with both direct and indirect evidence (Andres, 2019;Guthrie et al, 2009;Power et al, 2020;Steensel et al, 2019), we presume the level of perceived difficulty to have a negative effect on performance, beyond and above the effects of self-efficacy and interest. The potential effects of changes in each construct on performance remain more speculative.…”
Section: Present Studysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the third question (Q3), we expect, based on previous findings (Barba et al, 2016;Burns et al, 2020;Hidi, 1990;Niemivirta & Tapola, 2007;Nuutila et al, 2020;Richardson et al, 2012;Rotgans & Schmidt, 2018;Schöber et al, 2018;Talsma et al, 2018;Vainikainen et al, 2015), the initial levels of situational interest and self-efficacy to be predictive of task performance. Similarly, in line with both direct and indirect evidence (Andres, 2019;Guthrie et al, 2009;Power et al, 2020;Steensel et al, 2019), we presume the level of perceived difficulty to have a negative effect on performance, beyond and above the effects of self-efficacy and interest. The potential effects of changes in each construct on performance remain more speculative.…”
Section: Present Studysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…properties of the task, and peripheral cues, such as perceptions of one s performance, feelings of fatigue, and completion time (Koriat, 1997;Vangsness & Young, 2017, 2019. In a sense, then, feelings of difficulty during a task can be seen as metacognitive experiences that play an important role in a person s self-regulation and online awareness as the tasks unfold (Efklides, 2001).…”
Section: Judgements Of Difficulty Depend On Central Cues Such As Objmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transition to the technology will help to extract more information that will be used as based for another type of learning it is an evolution process [56] that which climax is codification, by the subjects, critical thinking aspects, social and academic skills [57]. A good example of this is that the active learning will spread motivation, more and more, dealing and managing difficulties before the problems [58] increase in the way that people can develop the attitudes of curiosity and research to aim new answers from new questions [59]. In higher education, we will see active learning becoming an everyday life practice, where students exchange experiences, research approaches, and visit more degree programs [60], working and knowing better than ever, but each case is a case, and the knowledge world is very diverse, so what we know about the future?…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the educational setting it is vital that student motivation is fostered, and that good performance is ensured [9]. Consequently, the importance of updating teaching methodologies has frequently been addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%