2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00038
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The phenomenon of loss aversion (the tendency for losses to have a greater impact than comparable gains) has long been observed in daily life. Neurocognitive studies and brain imaging studies have shed light on the correlation between the phenomenon of loss aversion and the brain region of the prefrontal cortex. Recent brain stimulation studies using bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have obtained various results showing the causal relationship betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(75 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two independent reviewers excluded 908 records according to their titles and abstracts during the early stage of screening. Finally, 70 records were excluded during the full-text screening and data extraction, and 20 articles were evaluated as eligible studies: including 16 articles on tDCS, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] two on tACS, 31, 32 one on tPCS, 33 and one on highdefinition tDCS. 34 One of these articles was open label 15 and the remaining 19 were randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Synthesized Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two independent reviewers excluded 908 records according to their titles and abstracts during the early stage of screening. Finally, 70 records were excluded during the full-text screening and data extraction, and 20 articles were evaluated as eligible studies: including 16 articles on tDCS, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] two on tACS, 31, 32 one on tPCS, 33 and one on highdefinition tDCS. 34 One of these articles was open label 15 and the remaining 19 were randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Synthesized Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) confirmed that both DLPFC and OFC regions, particularly the left side of DLPFC, played significant and key roles in cognitive processing when subjects had to solve the NP regardless of difficulty levels. Several previous studies in the literature have reported that DLPFC is responsible for risky decision making (in non-business context) and cognitive control in terms of planning and working memory 5,12,14,15 . Our findings in this paper are consistent with those reported in these documents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the die rolling task, where participants can lie about money earned, has also been used during tDCS stimulation (Marechel et al, 2017) Fecteau et al, 2007). The Iowa Gambling Task has also been used Fecteau et al, 2007) as well as the Columbia Gambling Task (Pripfl et al, 2013) and other gambling tasks (Bell et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2017;Ye et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2017). A riskiness study that incorporated tDCS and a driving simulation has also been done (Belli et al, 2008).…”
Section: Honestymentioning
confidence: 99%