2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2012.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of the BRCA1/Chk1/p53/p21Cip1/Waf1 pathway by nitric oxide and cell cycle arrest in human neuroblastoma NB69 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, NO has been shown to negatively regulate the proliferation of human neuroblastoma cell lines by decreasing the expression of the oncogene c-Myc in a cGMP-dependent manner (Ciani et al, 2004). Moreover, NO can inhibit the proliferation of a human neuroblastoma cancer cell line in vitro by upregulating tumor suppressor pathways, including the BRCA1/Chk1/p53 pathway, leading to cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage via activation of cell cycle checkpoints (Van de Wouwer et al, 2012). Of note, the dual roles of NO in cancer are also dose-dependent; while exogenous NO stimulated cell proliferation in pheochromocytoma PC12 cells at low concentrations, it inhibited proliferation at higher concentrations (Bal-Price et al, 2006).…”
Section: Dichotomous Roles Of No In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, NO has been shown to negatively regulate the proliferation of human neuroblastoma cell lines by decreasing the expression of the oncogene c-Myc in a cGMP-dependent manner (Ciani et al, 2004). Moreover, NO can inhibit the proliferation of a human neuroblastoma cancer cell line in vitro by upregulating tumor suppressor pathways, including the BRCA1/Chk1/p53 pathway, leading to cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage via activation of cell cycle checkpoints (Van de Wouwer et al, 2012). Of note, the dual roles of NO in cancer are also dose-dependent; while exogenous NO stimulated cell proliferation in pheochromocytoma PC12 cells at low concentrations, it inhibited proliferation at higher concentrations (Bal-Price et al, 2006).…”
Section: Dichotomous Roles Of No In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low concentrations of NO donors promote cancer progression by the activation of several mitogenic pathways, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin pathways [11,12,21]. Higher doses of NO donors negatively regulate the proliferation of cancer cells by attenuating the expression of oncogenes and by the upregulation of tumor suppressors (BRCA1/Chk1/p53) culminating in cell cycle arrest via the activation of cell cycle checkpoints [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that DETA/NO arrested cancer cells in the G1 phase. Van de Wouwer et al [14] observed that short- and long-lived NO donors inhibited the proliferation of human neuroblastoma NB69 cells by controlling G1/S transition via transcriptional repressors pRb and cyclin D1 and also by down-regulating systems regulating the S and G2/M phases. Consistent with these results, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a NO donor, is shown to cause G0/G1 arrest in HepG2 cells [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One proposed mechanism for the anticancer effects of NO is through the upregulation of a pathway involving BRCA1, Chk1, p53, and p21. This pathway is involved in controlling the cell cycle and can cause cell cycle arrest and cell death in response to DNA damage or other types of cellular stress [ 76 ].…”
Section: Clinical Use Against Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%