1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199907)33:1<26::aid-syn3>3.0.co;2-4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Action of substance P (neurokinin-1) receptor activation on rat neostriatal projection neurons

Abstract: Substance P (SP) acts as a neurotransmitter in the neostriatum through the axon collaterals of spiny projection neurons. However, possible direct or indirect actions of SP on the neostriatal output neurons have not been described. Targets of SP terminals within the neostriatum include interneurons, spiny neurons, afferent fibers and boutons. SP induces the release of both dopamine (DA) and acetylcholine (ACh). Since some postsynaptic actions of both DA and ACh on spiny neurons are known, we asked if activation… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
16
7
0
0

Citation Types

1
12
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
17
3
1

Relationship

2
19

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 21 publications

(13 citation statements)
references

References 52 publications

1
12
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, in this region, SP‐immunoreactive terminals form synapses with cholinergic dendrites (Martone et al, 1992), suggesting that the functional sites for NK1 receptor activation are at these synapses. Synaptic transmission is consistent with the known calcium dependence of NK1 receptor‐mediated excitation of cholinergic striatal neurons (Bell et al, 1998) that is believed to be largely responsible for the atropine‐sensitive, SP‐evoked excitation of spiny projection neurons (Galarraga et al, 1999). A recent ultrastructural study has suggested, however, that, in the CPN, SP is released from sites that are remote from NK1 receptors, supporting a paracrine mode of transmission (Li et al, 2000).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, in this region, SP‐immunoreactive terminals form synapses with cholinergic dendrites (Martone et al, 1992), suggesting that the functional sites for NK1 receptor activation are at these synapses. Synaptic transmission is consistent with the known calcium dependence of NK1 receptor‐mediated excitation of cholinergic striatal neurons (Bell et al, 1998) that is believed to be largely responsible for the atropine‐sensitive, SP‐evoked excitation of spiny projection neurons (Galarraga et al, 1999). A recent ultrastructural study has suggested, however, that, in the CPN, SP is released from sites that are remote from NK1 receptors, supporting a paracrine mode of transmission (Li et al, 2000).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…As most striatal neurons are quiescent (Chevalier and Deniau, 1990), the facilitation on sIPSCs observed in the present studies is consistent with the scenario that excitation of pallidal neurons resulted in action potential dependent GABA release from their collaterals. However, since substance P also exerted both excitatory and inhibitory actions on striatal projection neurons (Galarraga et al, 1999), we cannot rule out the possibility of increased GABA release from striatum. Morphological and electrophysiological studies have revealed that subthalamic nucleus is the major glutamatergic input onto the globus pallidus.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 92%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Intrathecal injection of GR-73632 in the spinal cord of mice caused dose-dependent behavioral responses such as scratching, biting and licking that were inhibited by the co-administration of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (Sakurada et al, 1999). Moreover, in similar fashion to substance P, the infusion of GR-73632 elicited dopamine and acetylcholine turnover in the striatum (Galarraga et al, 1999). Our data show that the intrastriatal injection of GR-73632 induced the production of NO and this induction was attenuated by the co-administration of WIN-51,708.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 97%