2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4768955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic excitations in glassy sorbitol and their relation with the fragility and the boson peak

Abstract: We report a detailed analysis of the dynamic structure factor of glassy sorbitol by using inelastic X-ray scattering and previously measured light scattering data [B. Ruta, G. Monaco, F. Scarponi, and D. Fioretto, Philos. Mag. 88, 3939 (2008)]. The thus obtained knowledge on the density-density fluctuations at both the mesoscopic and macroscopic length scale has been used to address two debated topics concerning the vibrational properties of glasses. The relation between the acoustic modes and the universal bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
52
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The f(q,t) corresponds to the dynamic structure factor normalized to the S(q) and gives therefore information on the dynamics on a spatial length scale defined by 2π/q. In glass formers, f(q,t) is usually described by the empirical Kohlrausch-Williams-Watt (KWW) function f(q,t)=fqexp(-t/τ) β [25], where τ is the characteristic relaxation time, β the shape parameter, and fq is the nonergodicity plateau before the final decay associated to structural relaxation [29,30]. In order to compare dynamic and structural properties, we performed two ramps in temperature, first heating the as-quenched sample up to 420 K (ramp 1) and then cooling it down again, always with a fixed rate of 1 K/min (ramp 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The f(q,t) corresponds to the dynamic structure factor normalized to the S(q) and gives therefore information on the dynamics on a spatial length scale defined by 2π/q. In glass formers, f(q,t) is usually described by the empirical Kohlrausch-Williams-Watt (KWW) function f(q,t)=fqexp(-t/τ) β [25], where τ is the characteristic relaxation time, β the shape parameter, and fq is the nonergodicity plateau before the final decay associated to structural relaxation [29,30]. In order to compare dynamic and structural properties, we performed two ramps in temperature, first heating the as-quenched sample up to 420 K (ramp 1) and then cooling it down again, always with a fixed rate of 1 K/min (ramp 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is the use of the first moment sum rule, which, however, is helpful only if the temperature is sufficiently low that the intensities of the Stokes and anti-Stokes peaks differ significantly [27]. In principle, a good way to normalize the spectra also at high temperatures is given by the classical second moment sum rule [22,[28][29][30], but the use of this normalization procedure on the experimental data is of difficult implementation for two main reasons. One relates to the fact that the spectrum is the convolution of the dynamic structure factor with the resolution function, which has Lorentzian-like tails and thus its second moment is, strictly speaking, undefined.…”
Section: A Normalization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IXS cross section is proportional to the dynamic structure factor SðQ; ωÞ convoluted with the instrumental resolution function RðωÞ. The proportionality factor, which is a function of the analyzer reflectivity, the detectors efficiency, and the atomic form factors, is determined using the second moment sum rule [48]. At sufficiently low Q's the SðQ; ωÞ of a glass can be modeled as a delta function for the elastic line and a damped harmonic oscillator (DHO) for the inelastic component.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%