Achievements and Shortcomings of Brazil's Innovation Policies

Koeller, Priscila; Cassiolato, José Eduardo

doi:10.7135/upo9781843318149.005

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…8 On the other hand, EST and BRA also have some generic similarities as catching-up economies. 9 Crucial similarities for the current analysis can be found in the assessments of the socio-economic performance of both countries, in the current IP governance challenges and recent key IP reforms (e.g., for EST see Kattel, 2004;Technopolis Group, 2006;Karo, 2010; for BRA see Sa, 2005;Nassif, 2007;Koeller and Cassiolato, 2009):…”

Section: Coordinating Innovation Policies In Brazil and Estoniamentioning

confidence: 97%

“…As the chosen ISI policy and the aims of technological development were rather complex and intensive, it resulted also in several new institutional transformations over the decades -e.g., the creation of state-owned enterprises (Petrobras in 1953), agencies with special tasks for S&T policy (e.g., BNDES created the National Technical and Scientific Fund in 1964; FINEP, the Agency for Financing Studies and Projects was set-up in 1969). Koeller and Cassiolato (2009) have argued that the end of the 1960s and the 1970s differed from previous eras of S&T efforts as the economic growth had allowed significant amounts of resources to be directed to the field. Nassif (2007) has argued that S&T policy was allowed to grow because most military governments of the period placed a high emphasis on S&T autonomy.…”

Section: Coordinating Innovation Policies In Brazil and Estoniamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A parallel development was the emergence of FINEP as the centre of S&T policy. It started to design policies to foster linkages between the S&T sector and the industrial sector to increase industry R&D because the ISI period had resulted in high levels of heterogeneity across and within industries (Koeller and Cassiolato, 2009). Indeed, it can be argued that overall, the S&T system was highly heterogeneous, or fragmented, with several agencies (e.g., FINEP and BNDES), state-owned enterprises (e.g., Petrobras, Embraer, EMBRAPA) and also subsidiaries of MNCs pursuing R&D efforts to build needed capabilities for technological accumulation.…”

Section: Coordinating Innovation Policies In Brazil and Estoniamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil

Karo

Kattel

2010

IJTLID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper highlights some of the crucial weaknesses of innovationpolicy-research that limit the relevance of this research for policy-making practices in catching-up countries. The paper proposes a framework that takes a multi-level and dynamic approach towards studying innovation-policy-making processes. This framework is applied herein to examine the evolution of innovation policy and governance trajectories of Estonia and Brazil and how this has affected the capacities for technological accumulation and development. The paper argues that crucial aspects of these contextual trajectories are being overlooked by standard innovation policy and governance analyses. In terms of policy implications, the paper concludes that the increasing influence of external pressures on innovation policy trajectories of catching-up countries is only reinforcing the use of narrow analytical perspectives and threatens to further de-contextualise innovation-policy-making in these countries. The spread of 'participatory' or 'networked' innovation policy models is presented as an example of these tendencies.

show abstract

Section: Coordinating Innovation Policies In Brazil and Estoniamentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Coordinating Innovation Policies In Brazil and Estoniamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Coordinating Innovation Policies In Brazil and Estoniamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil

Karo

Kattel

2010

IJTLID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Construídas sob um viés de correção das "falhas de mercado" e trazendo características de política ofertista, os resultados negativos acarretaram em ausência de planejamento orçamentário e de coordenação entre as demais políticas adotadas (KOELLER & CASSIOLATO, 2009;MATTOS, 2013;RAPINI, 2010). De fato, o exame acerca do alinhamento das políticas industrial e de C, T&I será realizado nos capítulos seguintes baseados em duas modalidades de financiamento à inovação: subvenção econômica e operações de crédito.…”

Section: Durante O II Pndunclassified

Análise da Evolução dos Editais Finep de Subvenção Econômica à Inovação

Pinho¹,

Gomes²

2017

Blucher Engineering Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoEste estudo examina as evoluções presentes nos editais da Finep em Subvenção Econômica à Inovação, a partir do primeiro edital lançado em 2006. Para tal, é traçada uma trajetória da agência financeira nessa modalidade de financiamento vis-à-vis com as políticas industriais de cada período. O artigo foi elaborado em dois pontos básicos: histórico recente da estruturação das instituições e mecanismos de apoio ao desenvolvimento científico, tecnológico e à inovação no Brasil; e descrição dos editais de Subvenção Econômica publicados pela Finep, de 2006 a 2013, vis-à-vis as políticas industriais vigentes. Os resultados apontam para uma convergência dos recursos às micro e pequenas empresas, independente das áreas prioritárias, mas apresenta baixa utilização do total aportado pela Finep em comparação a outras modalidades de financiamento.Palavras-chave: Financiamento; Inovação tecnológica; Subvenção econômica; Finep.Códigos JEL: O30; O31; O38. AbstractThis study examines present evolution in Finep's economic subvention, using the year 2006 as a starting point of analysis. In order to conduct this examination, it seeks to set the path of Finep vis-avis to industrial policies. The research is structured into two basic points:recente historical background of public institutions and support mechanisms to develop sciente, technology and innovation in Brazil; and an overview of economic subvention public notices, from 2006 to 2013, comparing to industrial policy applied in each specific period. Results shows a convergence of resources to micro and small companies. However, there's a low amount application compared to others funding categories.

show abstract

“…Diversos autores (CASSIOLATO, 2008;DE NEGRI, 2012;KOELLER;CASSIOLATO, 2011;SCHWARTZMAN, 2008;VIOTTI, 2003VIOTTI, , 2008 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 % Patentes brasileiras concedidas pelo USPTO % Artigos brasileiros publicados em periódicos científicos indexados pela Scopus 2.1.9.3 Principais motivações do baixo grau de inovação no Brasil 2.1.…”

Section: Avaliação Do Sni No Brasilunclassified

Setor sucroenergético e sua dinâmica de inovação

Sousa¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Achievements and Shortcomings of Brazil's Innovation Policies

Cited by 8 publications

References 10 publications

Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil

Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil

Análise da Evolução dos Editais Finep de Subvenção Econômica à Inovação

Setor sucroenergético e sua dinâmica de inovação

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About