1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1989.tb03376.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achalasia microcephaly syndrome in a patient with consanguineous parents: support for a.m. being a distinct autosomal recessive condition

Abstract: A 4 9/12‐year‐old boy with achalasia microcephaly syndrome (AMS), born to a consanguineous couple, is reported. Comparative analysis of this case and the patients previously described in a Mexican family supports the notion that the syndrome is a distinct autosomal recessive condition. It is interesting that the area of origin and ethnicity of both the present and the previously reported cases is northwest Mexico.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was no known consanguinity in the first case (Kreuz et al 1999), the parents of the second case were second-degree cousins (Hernandez et al 1989). Interestingly, the latter family came from the same area of northwest Mexico as the family described in the initial report (see above).…”
Section: Achalasia Microcephaly Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was no known consanguinity in the first case (Kreuz et al 1999), the parents of the second case were second-degree cousins (Hernandez et al 1989). Interestingly, the latter family came from the same area of northwest Mexico as the family described in the initial report (see above).…”
Section: Achalasia Microcephaly Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies failed to identify familial clustering of achalasia, but most of the achalasia cases may be as a result of consanguinity and may occur in siblings, suggesting autosomal recessive inheritance. Some authors argue about the genetic predisposition to achalasia [12] , [13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%